ArticleCarcinogenesis2020
Cooperative participation of epigenomic and genomic alterations in the clinicopathological diversity of gastric adenocarcinomas: significance of cell adhesion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related signaling pathways.
Article in Carcinogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-wide DNA methylation profiling during metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis-related hepatocarcinogenesis in patients in Japan and the United States.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- BNC2 in Development and Disease: Regulatory Mechanisms and Translational Implications.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Surgical Treatment of Lung Adenocarcinoma Tumor Thrombus Extending Into the Left Atrium: A Case Report.Clinical case reports · 2026Article
- Prognostically Significant Glycan Profiles of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Identified by Integrated Glycome-Methylome Analysis.Pathology international · 2026Article
- Plasma cell-free DNA methylation profile before afatinib treatment is associated with progression-free and overall survival of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor gene mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer.Clinical epigenetics · 2025Article
- Cellular lineage origins of spasmolytic polypeptide-expressing metaplasia (SPEM): persistent and intensifying debates.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Review
- Molecular pathological approach to cancer epigenomics and its clinical application.Pathology international · 2024Review
- DNA methylation status of the SPHK1 and LTB genes underlies the clinicopathological diversity of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis-related hepatocellular carcinomas.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Quantification of DNA methylation for carcinogenic risk estimation in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.Clinical epigenetics · 2022Article
- Landscape of Druggable Molecular Pathways Downstream of Genomic CDH1/Cadherin-1 Alterations in Gastric Cancer.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Review
- Genotoxic Potential of Nanoparticles: Structural and Functional Modifications in DNA.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The present study was conducted to clarify the cooperative significance of epigenomic and genomic abnormalities during gastric carcinogenesis. Using 21 samples of normal control gastric mucosa (C), 109 samples of non-cancerous gastric mucosa (N) and 105 samples of cancerous tissue (T) from 109 patients with primary gastric adenocarcinomas, genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using Infinium assay. Among these samples, 66 paired N and corresponding T samples were subjected to whole-exome and single nucleotide polymorphism array analyses. As had been shown in our previous study, 109 patients were clustered clinicopathologically into least aggressive Cluster A (n = 20), most aggressive Cluster B1 (n = 20) and Cluster B2 (n = 69). Most DNA methylation alterations in each cluster had already occurred even in N samples compared with C samples, and DNA methylation alterations at the precancerous N stage were inherited by the established cancers themselves. Recurrent single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions resulting in functional disruption of the proteins encoded by the ABCA10, BNC2, CDH1, CTNNB1, SMAD4 and VAV2 genes were specific to Cluster B1, whereas those of the APC, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, MLH1 and MUC6 genes were specific to Cluster A. MetaCore pathway analysis revealed that the epigenomically affected TWIST1 gene and genomically affected CDH1, CTNNB1, MMP9, TLN2, ROCK1 and SMAD4 genes were accumulated in signaling pathways related to cell adhesion, cytoskeleton remodeling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in Cluster B1. These data indicate that epigenomic alterations at the precancerous stage are important in gastric carcinogenesis and that epigenomic and genomic alterations cooperatively underlie the aggressiveness of gastric adenocarcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.