Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710740›Full record

ArticleCarcinogenesis2020

Cooperative participation of epigenomic and genomic alterations in the clinicopathological diversity of gastric adenocarcinomas: significance of cell adhesion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related signaling pathways.

Menghan Yang, Eri Arai, Yoriko Takahashi, Hirohiko Totsuka, Suenori Chiku, Hirokazu Taniguchi, Hitoshi Katai, Hiromi Sakamoto, Teruhiko Yoshida, Yae Kanai

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Carcinogenesis, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Menghan YangDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Eri AraiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoriko TakahashiBiomedical Department, Cloud Service Division, IT Infrastructure Services Unit, Mitsui Knowledge Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Hirohiko TotsukaBioinformatics Group, Research and Development Center, Solution Division 4, Hitachi Government and Public Corporation System Engineering Ltd., Tokyo, Japan.
Suenori ChikuInformation and Communication Research Division, Mizuho Information and Research Institute, Inc., Tokyo, Japan.
Hirokazu TaniguchiDepartment of Clinical Laboratories, JR Tokyo General Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi KataiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Hiromi SakamotoFundamental Innovative Oncology Core Center, National Cancer Center Research Institute, Tokyo, Japan.
Teruhiko YoshidaDepartment of Genetic Medicine and Services, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Yae KanaiDepartment of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Keio University · JPHitachi (Japan) · JPJR Tokyo General Hospital · JPMizuho (Japan) · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study was conducted to clarify the cooperative significance of epigenomic and genomic abnormalities during gastric carcinogenesis. Using 21 samples of normal control gastric mucosa (C), 109 samples of non-cancerous gastric mucosa (N) and 105 samples of cancerous tissue (T) from 109 patients with primary gastric adenocarcinomas, genome-wide DNA methylation analysis was performed using Infinium assay. Among these samples, 66 paired N and corresponding T samples were subjected to whole-exome and single nucleotide polymorphism array analyses. As had been shown in our previous study, 109 patients were clustered clinicopathologically into least aggressive Cluster A (n = 20), most aggressive Cluster B1 (n = 20) and Cluster B2 (n = 69). Most DNA methylation alterations in each cluster had already occurred even in N samples compared with C samples, and DNA methylation alterations at the precancerous N stage were inherited by the established cancers themselves. Recurrent single nucleotide variants and insertions/deletions resulting in functional disruption of the proteins encoded by the ABCA10, BNC2, CDH1, CTNNB1, SMAD4 and VAV2 genes were specific to Cluster B1, whereas those of the APC, EGFR, ERBB2, ERBB3, MLH1 and MUC6 genes were specific to Cluster A. MetaCore pathway analysis revealed that the epigenomically affected TWIST1 gene and genomically affected CDH1, CTNNB1, MMP9, TLN2, ROCK1 and SMAD4 genes were accumulated in signaling pathways related to cell adhesion, cytoskeleton remodeling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition in Cluster B1. These data indicate that epigenomic alterations at the precancerous stage are important in gastric carcinogenesis and that epigenomic and genomic alterations cooperatively underlie the aggressiveness of gastric adenocarcinomas.

Indexed as

Cell AdhesionEpithelial-Mesenchymal TransitionPolymorphism, Single NucleotideAdenocarcinomaAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesDNA MethylationEpigenesis, GeneticEpigenomicsExome SequencingFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID32710740
PMCPMC7665242
OpenAlexW3043989775

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.