Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710709›Full record

ArticlePediatric blood & cancer2020

Cost-effectiveness of levofloxacin prophylaxis against bacterial infection in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia.

Meghan McCormick, Erika Friehling, Ramasubramanian Kalpatthi, Nalyn Siripong, Kenneth Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meghan McCormickDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0003-3633-6369
Erika FriehlingDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Ramasubramanian KalpatthiDivision of Pediatric Hematology-Oncology, UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Nalyn SiripongThe Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Kenneth SmithDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Funding

University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001857 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2016 to 2025
$129.3M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001857NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInfections are the leading cause of therapy-related mortality in pediatric patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Although effectiveness of levofloxacin antibacterial prophylaxis in oncology patients is recognized, its cost-effectiveness is unknown. This study evaluated epidemiologic data regarding levofloxacin use and the cost-effectiveness of this strategy as the cost per bacteremia episode, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and death avoided in children with AML. PROCEDURE: A retrospective cohort study using the Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS) database compared demographic and clinical characteristics and receipt of levofloxacin prophylaxis in children with AML admitted for chemotherapy from January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2018. We then developed a decision analysis model in this population that compared costs associated with bacteremia, ICU admission, or death secondary to bacteremia to levofloxacin prophylaxis cost from a healthcare perspective. Time horizon is one chemotherapy cycle. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses evaluated model uncertainty.

resultsProphylaxis cost $8491 per bacteremia episode prevented compared with an average added hospital cost of $119 478. Prophylaxis cost $81 609 per ICU admission avoided, compared with an average added hospital cost of $94 181. Prophylaxis cost $220 457 per death avoided. In sensitivity analysis, at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per bacteremia episode avoided, prophylaxis remained cost-effective in 94.6% of simulations. Prophylaxis use was more common in recent years in patients with relapsed disease and with chemotherapy regimens considered more intensive.

conclusionProphylaxis is cost-effective in preventing bacterial infections in patients with AML. Findings support increased use in patients considered at high risk of bacterial infection secondary to myelosuppression.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibiotic ProphylaxisBacterial InfectionsChildFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIntensive Care UnitsLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteLevofloxacinMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsLevofloxacinacute myeloid leukemiachildinfectionlevofloxacinprophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID32710709
PMCPMC7722035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.