ArticleJournal of occupational health2020
Is work engagement associated with healthier dietary patterns? A cross-sectional study.
Article in Journal of occupational health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Relationships between individual attitudes and occupational stress. A cross-sectional study.AIMS public health · 2025Article
- Work engagement among health professionals in public health facilities of Bench-Sheko zone, southwest Ethiopia.BMC health services research · 2023Article
- The Relationship between Dietary Habits and Work Engagement among Female Finnish Municipal Employees.Nutrients · 2022Article
- Factors Associated with the Work Engagement of Employees Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Work engagement and associated factors among dental nurses in China.BMC oral health · 2021Article
- Is work engagement associated with healthier dietary patterns? A cross-sectional study.Journal of occupational health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesWork engagement is defined as a positive, fulfilling feeling about one's job and is associated with higher productivity and morale. We performed a cross-sectional study to investigate whether work engagement is related to healthier dietary behaviors among Japanese workers.
methodsThe present study was part of the Japanese Study of Health, Occupation, and Psychosocial Factors Related to Equity. A validated food frequency questionnaire was used to evaluate daily nutritional intake. The following seven nutrients were considered: salt intake, dietary fat (saturated fatty acids, monounsaturated fatty acids, and polyunsaturated fatty acids), dietary fiber, folate, and isoflavone. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed, adjusting for job stress, psychological distress, and other confounders. The baseline survey inquired about work engagement among 2,233 employees of 12 workplaces in Japan, representing a range of industries.
resultsThe mean age of the sample was 43.4 ± 9.7 years and 89.7% of the participants were male. The mean score of work engagement was 2.9 ± 1.0. Higher work engagement was significantly positively associated with higher salt intake (β = 0.17, SE = 0.06, P = .006), monounsaturated fatty acids (β = 0.29, SE = 0.13, P = .03), polyunsaturated fatty acids (β = 0.28, SE = 0.09, P = .001), dietary fiber (β = 0.23, SE = 0.09, P = .012), and folate (β = 10.2, SE = 2.9, P = .005) consumption, but not saturated fatty acid (β = 0.16, SE = 0.11, P = .13) or isoflavone (β = 0.64, SE = 0.36, P = .072).
conclusionThe present study suggested that higher work engagement is associated with a healthier pattern of dietary behaviors among workers. Improving work engagement may be a novel target for workplace health promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.