Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710677›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of the Salt Substitute in India Study (SSiIS): The protocol for a double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial.

Sudhir Raj Thout, Jie Yu, Maoyi Tian, Mark D Huffman, Clare Arnott, Qiang Li, Praveen Devarsetty, Claire Johnson, Simone Pettigrew, Bruce Neal and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Maximizing the potential of the Salt Substitute in India Study.Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.) · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Sudhir Raj ThoutThe George Institute for Global Health India, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0383-4206
Jie YuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Maoyi TianThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Mark D HuffmanThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Clare ArnottThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Qiang LiThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Praveen DevarsettyThe George Institute for Global Health India, Punjagutta, Hyderabad, India.
Claire JohnsonThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1497-7651
Simone PettigrewThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Bruce NealThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Jason H Y WuThe George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUGeorge Institute for Global Health · INPeking University · CNNorthwestern University · USThe University of Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reduced-sodium, added-potassium salt substitutes have favorable effects on blood pressure, but have not been tested in India. The Salt Substitute in India Study (SSiIS) is a double-blinded, randomized-controlled trial designed to investigate the effects of reduced-sodium, added-potassium salt substitution to replace usual cooking salt use and blood pressure (BP) among hypertensive patients in rural India. The primary objective is to assess effects on systolic blood pressure at 3 months. The secondary objectives are to determine effects on diastolic blood pressure, urinary sodium, and potassium levels, and to determine acceptability of the intervention. Eligible individuals received usual salt (100% sodium chloride) or salt substitute (70% sodium chloride and 30% potassium chloride) to replace all salt required for cooking and seasoning in the household. A total of 502 participants aged ≥18 years with a history of hypertension were successfully recruited and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to intervention or control, between November 2019 and January 2020. Mean blood pressure at baseline was 133.5/83.6 mm Hg and 96% were using one or more blood pressure-lowering medications. The overall mean average 24-hour urinary sodium excretion was 2825 (SD, 1166) mg/L, which corresponds to a urinary salt excretion of 10.4 g/d. Baseline findings suggest sodium intake in this population significantly exceeds World Health Organization recommendations. The SSiIS trial has successfully recruited participants and is well placed to determine whether salt substitution is an effective means of lowering blood pressure for rural Indian patients with hypertension.

Indexed as

HypertensionAdolescentAdultBlood PressureDiet, Sodium-RestrictedHumansIndiaRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSodium Chloride, DietarySodium Chloride, Dietaryblood pressurehypertensionIndiasalt substitute

Identifiers

PMID32710677
PMCPMC8029753
OpenAlexW3045422688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.