Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710674›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2020

Use of distinct anti-hypertensive drugs and risk for COVID-19 among hypertensive people: A population-based cohort study in Southern Catalonia, Spain.

Angel Vila-Corcoles, Eva Satue-Gracia, Olga Ochoa-Gondar, Cristina Torrente-Fraga, Frederic Gomez-Bertomeu, Angel Vila-Rovira, Imma Hospital-Guardiola, Cinta de Diego-Cabanes, Ferran Bejarano-Romero, Dolors Rovira-Veciana and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Proton Pump Inhibitor Use Is Not Strongly Associated With SARS-CoV-2 Related Outcomes: A Nationwide Study and Meta-analysis.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Statin and outcomes of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD · 2021 · on this map
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. COVID-19 and RAAS inhibitors: is there a final conclusion?Iranian journal of microbiology · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. FMC : Formacion medica continuada en atencion primaria · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Angel Vila-CorcolesPrimary Health Care Service Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Eva Satue-GraciaPrimary Health Care Service Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Olga Ochoa-GondarPrimary Health Care Service Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7015-0018
Cristina Torrente-FragaDepartment of Information and Communication Technologies, DAP Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Frederic Gomez-BertomeuDepartment of Microbiology, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Angel Vila-RoviraUnitat de Suport a la Recerca Tarragona-Reus, IDIAP Jordi Gol, Barcelona, Spain.
Imma Hospital-GuardiolaPrimary Health Care Service Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Cinta de Diego-CabanesPrimary Health Care Service Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Ferran Bejarano-RomeroDepartment of Farmacology, DAP Camp de Tarragona, Institut Catala de la Salut, Tarragona, Spain.
Dolors Rovira-VecianaDepartment of Laboral Medicine, ACTIVA Mutua, Tarragona, Spain.
Josep Basora-GallisaFundació Institut Universitari per a la recerca a l'Atenció Primària de Salut Jordi Gol i Gurina (IDIAPJGol), Barcelona, Spain.
Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol · ESInstitut Català de la Salut · ESHospital Universitari Joan XXIII de Tarragona · ESUniversity Hospital Mútua de Terrassa · ES

Funding

Instituto de Salud Carlos III COV20/00852
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of some anti-hypertensive drugs in the current COVID-19 pandemic has become controversial. This study investigated possible relationships between anti-hypertensive medications use and COVID-19 infection risk in the ambulatory hypertensive population. This is a population-based retrospective cohort study involving 34 936 hypertensive adults >50 years in Tarragona (Southern Catalonia, Spain) who were retrospectively followed through pandemic period (from 01/03/2020 to 30/04/2020). Two data sets including demographic/clinical characteristics (comorbidities and cardiovascular medications use) and laboratory PCR codes for COVID-19 were linked to construct an anonymized research database. Cox regression was used to calculate multivariable hazard ratios (HRs) and estimate the risk of suffering COVID-19 infection. Across study period, 205 PCR-confirmed COVID-19 cases were observed, which means an overall incidence of 586.8 cases per 100 000 persons-period. In multivariable analyses, only age (HR: 1.03; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; P < .001) and nursing home residence (HR: 19.60; 95% CI: 13.80-27.84; P < .001) appeared significantly associated with increased risk of COVID-19. Considering anti-hypertensive drugs, receiving diuretics (HR: 1.22; 95% CI: 0.90-1.67; P = .205), calcium channel blockers (HR: 1.29; 95%CI: 0.91-1.82; P = .148), beta-blockers (HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.68-1.37; P = .844), and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.61-1.13; P = .238) did not significantly alter the risk of PCR-confirmed COVID-19, whereas receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers was associated with an almost statistically significant reduction risk (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.44-1.01; P = .054). In conclusion, our data support that receiving renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors does not predispose for suffering COVID-19 infection in ambulatory hypertensive people. Conversely, receiving angiotensin II receptor blockers could be related with a reduced risk.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsAgedAged, 80 and overAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersCase-Control StudiesComorbidityCOVID-19DiureticsFemaleHumansHypertensionIncidenceMaleAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsAngiotensin-Converting Enzyme InhibitorsAngiotensin Receptor AntagonistsAntihypertensive AgentsCalcium Channel BlockersDiureticsangiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitorsangiotensin II receptor blockersanti-hypertensive medicationCOVID-19hypertensionSARS-COV-2

Identifiers

PMID32710674
PMCPMC8029672
OpenAlexW3045124235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.