Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710546›Full record

ArticleThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2021

Vision Impairment and Participation in Cognitively Stimulating Activities: The Health ABC Study.

Varshini Varadaraj, Beatriz Munoz, Eleanor M Simonsick, Bonnielin K Swenor

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Varshini VaradarajWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Beatriz MunozWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Eleanor M SimonsickTranslational Gerontology Branch, National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, Maryland.
Bonnielin K SwenorWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.

Funding

Vision Loss and Cognition: Testing the sensory consequence hypothesisK01AG052640 · NIA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SWENOR, BONNIELIN · 2017 to 2021
$834k
NIA NIH HHS K01 AG052640
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEngagement in cognitively stimulating activities is associated with decreased rates of cognitive decline in older adults. However, most cognitively stimulating tasks require good vision, potentially affecting the ability of visually impaired adults to engage in these activities. We examined the relationship between vision and participation in cognitively stimulating activities.

methodData from the Health, Aging, and Body Composition study (1999-2005) were analyzed. Associations between visual function (visual acuity [VA], contrast sensitivity [CS], and stereo acuity [SA] impairments) and annual rates of change in number of cognitively stimulating activities (by self-report) performed at least once a month were examined.

resultsAnalyses included 924 participants aged 75.2 ± 2.8 years. At baseline, impaired CS (27%) and SA (29%) were associated with participation in fewer cognitive activities (β = -0.33, 95% CI = -0.63, -0.03 and β = -0.32, 95% CI = -0.61, -0.03, respectively), while VA (8%) was not (β = -0.34, 95% CI = -0.81, 0.13). In longitudinal models, groups with and without VA, CS, and SA impairments exhibited declines in monthly cognitive activities over time. Annual rates of decline were relatively higher in the VA (β = -0.16, 95% CI = -0.26, -0.05) and CS (β = -0.14, 95% CI = -0.19, -0.09) impaired groups than observed in the respective unimpaired groups (no VA: β = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.15, -0.10; no CS: β = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.15, -0.09), but did not achieve statistical significance. Stereo acuity (β = -0.13, 95% CI = -0.17, -0.09) and no SA (β = -0.13, 95% CI = -0.16, -0.10) groups had similar rates of decline.

conclusionsVisually impaired older adults participate in fewer cognitive activities and although participation decline is similar to the non-impaired, lower overall participation indicates a need to identify cognitively stimulating activities accessible to visually impaired older adults.

Indexed as

Persons with Visual DisabilitiesAgedCognitionCognitive DysfunctionCohort StudiesFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleVisual AcuityCognitionCognitive AgingSensoryVision loss

Identifiers

PMID32710546
PMCPMC8087276

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.