Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710437›Full record

SynthesisEndocrine2020

Circulating vitamin D and the risk of gestational diabetes: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Mehdi Sadeghian, Maryam Asadi, Sepideh Rahmani, Mohsen Akhavan Zanjani, Omid Sadeghi, Seyed Ahmad Hosseini, Ahmad Zare Javid

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Endocrine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Lifestyle Behaviors, Physical Activity, and Body Composition in Women With Gestational Diabetes: A Real-World Observational Study From Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mehdi SadeghianStudent Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8842-0904
Maryam AsadiStudent Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Sepideh RahmaniFood Security Research Center, Department of Community Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Science, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Mohsen Akhavan ZanjaniDivision of Kinesiology, School of Health and Human Performance, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Omid SadeghiStudents' Scientific Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Seyed Ahmad HosseiniStudent Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Ahmad Zare JavidStudent Research Committee, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran. ahmaddjavid@gmail.com.
Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences · IRDalhousie University · CAIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IRTehran University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences 98S75
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSeveral meta-analyses of observational studies revealed a modest increase in the risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) among pregnant women with low levels of serum vitamin D. However, no study examined a dose-response meta-analysis as well as a high versus low analysis in this regard.

methodsWe systematically searched PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Science, and Scopus up to August 2019 to find prospective observational studies investigating the association of serum 25(OH)D with the risk of developing GDM. Using a random-effects model, the reported risk estimates were pooled.

resultsNine cohort studies and six nested case-control studies were included in the final analysis (40,788 participants and 1848 cases). Considering linear analysis, each 10 nmol/L increase in circulating 25(OH)D was associated with a 2% lower risk of GDM (effect size (ES): 0.98; 95% CI: 0.98, 0.99; I

conclusionsIn conclusion, lower levels of serum 25(OH)D were associated with a higher chance of GDM. Differential results existed between the overall and subgroup analysis, either based on vitamin D detection methods or based on maternal age, although these subgroups partially lowered the heterogeneity.

Indexed as

Diabetes, GestationalVitamin D DeficiencyFemaleHumansObservational Studies as TopicPregnancyProspective StudiesVitamin DVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsDose-response meta-analysisGestational diabetes mellitusPregnancyVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID32710437
OpenAlexW3044021943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.