Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710396›Full record

Trial reportCNS drugs2020

Efficacy and Safety of Alemtuzumab Through 9 Years of Follow-up in Patients with Highly Active Disease: Post Hoc Analysis of CARE-MS I and II Patients in the TOPAZ Extension Study.

Tjalf Ziemssen, Ann D Bass, Regina Berkovich, Giancarlo Comi, Sara Eichau, Jeremy Hobart, Samuel F Hunter, Christopher LaGanke, Volker Limmroth, Daniel Pelletier and 10 more

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · hybridAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in CNS drugs, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00530348 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3 Randomized, Rater-Blinded Study Comparing Two Annual Cycles of Intravenous Alemtuzumab to Three-Times Weekly Subcutaneous Interferon Beta-1a (Rebif®) in Treatment-Naïve Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyRan2007 to 2011Enrolled581ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsAlemtuzumab, Interferon beta-1a
NCT00548405 phase3completednot on this map

A Phase 3, Randomized, Rater- and Dose-Blinded Study Comparing Two Annual Cycles of Intravenous Low- and High-Dose Alemtuzumab to Three-Times Weekly Subcutaneous Interferon Beta 1a (Rebif®) in Patients With Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Relapsed On Therapy

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyRan2007 to 2011Enrolled840ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsAlemtuzumab 12 mg, Alemtuzumab 24 mg, Interferon beta-1a
NCT00930553 phase3completednot on this map

An Extension Protocol for Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Participated in Genzyme-Sponsored Studies of Alemtuzumab

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyRan2009 to 2016Enrolled1,314ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsalemtuzumab
NCT02255656 phase4completednot on this map

A Long-term Follow-up Study for Multiple Sclerosis Patients Who Have Completed the Alemtuzumab Extension Study (CAMMS03409)

TypeinterventionalSponsorGenzyme, a Sanofi CompanyRan2015 to 2020Enrolled1,062ConditionsRelapsing Remitting Multiple SclerosisArmsalemtuzumab GZ402673
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Updates and advances in multiple sclerosis neurotherapeutics.Neurodegenerative disease management · 2023
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 17 institutions in 10 countries.

Tjalf ZiemssenCenter of Clinical Neuroscience, University Clinic Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. Tjalf.Ziemssen@uniklinikum-dresden.de.ORCID 0000-0001-8799-8202
Ann D BassNeurology Center of San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA.
Regina BerkovichRegina Berkovich, MD, PhD, Inc., West Hollywood, CA, USA.
Giancarlo ComiOspedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Sara EichauHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Jeremy HobartPlymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK.
Samuel F HunterAdvanced Neurosciences Institute, Franklin, TN, USA.
Christopher LaGankeNorth Central Neurology Associates, Cullman, AL, USA.
Volker LimmrothKlinik für Neurologie und Palliativmedizin, Cologne, Germany.
Daniel PelletierKeck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Carlo PozzilliDepartment of Human Neuroscience, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sven SchipplingNeuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Research, University Hospital Zürich and University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Livia SousaCentro Hospitalar e Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.
Anthony TraboulseeUniversity of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Bernard M J UitdehaagAmsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Bart Van WijmeerschRehabilitation and MS-Centre Overpelt, BIOMED, Hasselt University, Hasselt, Belgium.
Zia ChoudhrySanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Nadia DaizadehSanofi, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Barry A SingerMS Center for Innovations in Care, Missouri Baptist Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.
CARE-MS I, CARE-MS II, CAMMS03409, and TOPAZ investigators
Sanofi (United States) · USUniversity of Southern California · USAdvanced Neurosciences Institute · USAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLHasselt University · BEHospitais da Universidade de Coimbra · PTHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESIRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele · ITKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DEMissouri Baptist Medical Center · USPeninsula College of Medicine and Dentistry · GBSapienza University of Rome · ITUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Zurich · CHUrology Associates · USUrology San Antonio · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAlemtuzumab efficacy versus subcutaneous interferon-β-1a (SC IFNB-1a) was demonstrated over 2 years in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, with continued efficacy over 7 additional years. Alemtuzumab is included as a recommended treatment for patients with highly active disease (HAD) by the American Academy of Neurology Practice Guidelines, and the label indication in Europe was recently restricted to the treatment of HAD patients. There is currently no consensus definition for HAD, and alemtuzumab efficacy across various HAD definitions has not been explored previously.

objectivesIn this post hoc analysis, we assess the efficacy and safety of alemtuzumab in Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif

methodsPatients in the CARE-MS studies received either alemtuzumab (baseline: 5 days; 12 months later: 3 days) or SC IFNB-1a (3 times weekly). Alemtuzumab-treated patients who enrolled in the extensions could receive additional courses ≥ 12 months apart. Four definitions of HAD were applied to assess alemtuzumab efficacy: the pre-specified primary definition (two or more relapses in the year prior to baseline and at least one gadolinium [Gd]-enhancing lesion at baseline) and three alternative definitions that focused on relapse, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or prior treatment response criteria. Efficacy outcomes were annualized relapse rate, change in Expanded Disability Status Scale score, 6-month confirmed disability worsening, 6-month confirmed disability improvement, MRI disease activity, and brain volume change. Adverse events were summarized for HAD patients meeting the primary definition.

resultsIn the pooled CARE-MS population, 208 alemtuzumab-treated patients met the primary HAD definition. Annualized relapse rate was 0.27 in years 0-2 and 0.16 in years 3-9. Over 9 years, 62% of patients were free of 6-month confirmed disability worsening, 50% had 6-month confirmed disability improvement, and median cumulative change in brain volume was - 2.15%. During year 9, 62% had no evidence of disease activity, and 69% were free of MRI disease activity. Similar efficacy outcomes were observed using an alternative relapse-driven HAD definition. For patients meeting alternative HAD definitions focused on either higher MRI lesion counts or disease activity while on prior therapy, reduced efficacy for some endpoints was seen. Safety was consistent with the overall CARE-MS population through year 9.

conclusionsOver 9 years, alemtuzumab efficacy was maintained in CARE-MS HAD patients based on four HAD definitions. These results support intervention with alemtuzumab in patients with early indicators of HAD, including frequent relapse without high MRI activity. No safety signals were observed over 9 years that were unique to the HAD populations. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIERS: NCT00530348; NCT00548405; NCT00930553; NCT02255656.

Indexed as

AdultAlemtuzumabFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon beta-1aMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAlemtuzumabImmunologic FactorsInterferon beta-1a

Identifiers

PMID32710396
PMCPMC7447657
OpenAlexW3045363217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.