ArticleExperimental brain research2020
Modulation of cutaneous reflexes during sidestepping in adult humans.
Article in Experimental brain research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Normobaric hypoxia does not influence the sural nerve cutaneous reflex during standing.Experimental brain research · 2023Trial
- Spinal nociceptive and non-nociceptive processing of cutaneous afferent input in people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Effects of stochastic resonance on reflexive and perceptual outcomes in chronic ankle instability.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2025Article
- The role of sural nerve reflexes during drop-landing in subjects with and without chronic ankle instability.Experimental brain research · 2023Article
- Altered cutaneous reflexes to non-noxious stimuli in the triceps surae of people with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury.Journal of neurophysiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A common neural control mechanism coordinates various types of rhythmic locomotion performed in the sagittal plane, but it is unclear whether frontal plane movements show similar neural patterning in adult humans. The purpose of this study was to compare cutaneous reflex modulation patterns evoked during sagittal and frontal plane rhythmic movements. Eight healthy, neurologically intact adults (three males, five females) walked and sidestepped on a treadmill at approximately 1 Hz. The sural nerve of the dominant (and lead) limb was stimulated randomly every 3-7 steps at eight phases of each gait cycle. Ipsilateral electromyographic recordings from four lower leg muscles and kinematic data from the ankle were collected continuously throughout both tasks. Data from unstimulated gait cycles were used as control trials to calculate middle-latency reflex responses (80-120 ms) and kinematic changes (140-220 ms) following electrical stimulation. Results show that the cutaneous reflex modulation patterns were similar across both tasks despite significant differences in background EMG activity. However, increased reflex amplitudes were observed during the late swing and early stance phases of sidestepping, which directly altered ankle kinematics. These results suggest that the neural control mechanisms responsible for coordinating sagittal locomotion are flexibly modified to coordinate frontal plane activities even with very different foot landing mechanics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.