Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710338›Full record

ArticleBrain imaging and behavior2021

Prospective evaluation of functional brain activity and oxidative damage in breast cancer: changes in task-induced deactivation during a working memory task.

James C Root, Denise Pergolizzi, Hong Pan, Irene Orlow, Steven D Passik, David Silbersweig, Emily Stern, Tim A Ahles

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain imaging and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

James C RootDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA. rootj@mskcc.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7332-6165
Denise PergolizziSchool of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Hong PanDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Irene OrlowDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Steven D PassikCollegium Pharmaceuticals, Stoughton, MA, USA.
David SilbersweigDepartment of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Emily SternCeretype Neuromedicine, Inc, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Tim A AhlesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Avenue, 7th Floor, New York, NY, 10022, USA.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCollegium Pharmaceutical (United States) · USUniversitat Internacional de Catalunya · ES

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Training and Career Development CoreU54CA132378 · NCI · CITY COLLEGE OF NEW YORK · PI Bao Q Vuong · 2008 to 2026
$28.9M
Training and Career Development and Education CoreU54CA137788 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI ADRIANA ESPINOSA, FRANCESCA M GANY · 2008 to 2026
$28.1M
Psychosocial Palliative & Community Research in CancerT32CA009461 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JENNIFER L HAY, Jamie S. Ostroff · 1985 to 2026
$10.1M
Assessment of sensory gating, attention, and executive control in breast cancerR01CA218496 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI AHLES, TIM ALAN, ROOT, JAMES C · 2018 to 2022
$3.5M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS R01 CA218496NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009461NCI NIH HHS U54 CA132378NCI NIH HHS U54 CA137788Starr Cancer Consortium 1-A17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer-related cognitive dysfunction is an important issue for breast cancer survivors. Previous research has identified both cross-sectional and longitudinal alterations in brain function related to cancer status and treatment. In this study, we prospectively collected functional magnetic resonance imaging data in breast cancer cases treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and in controls with no cancer history during a working memory task. Data and blood specimens were collected immediately prior to the start of treatment (baseline) and following completion of treatment (follow-up), and at yoked intervals for controls. In secondary analysis we assessed the levels of oxidative DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes of cases and controls using the Comet assay. A significant group*time interaction revealed reduced deactivation in the superior frontal gyrus in the controls at follow-up, in contrast to cases, who exhibited similar magnitude of deactivation at baseline and follow-up. Working memory performance indicated a significant improvement in the controls at follow-up, and no change in performance in cases. In secondary analyses, oxidative DNA damage levels were elevated in the cases at follow-up compared to controls, but no associations were found between the Comet assay variables and functional imaging at either time-point or group. In light of previous reports on task induced deactivations, our findings reflect continuing effortful processing at follow-up in the breast cancer group, with relatively less effortful processing in the control group given the reduced novelty and practice effects from the baseline to follow-up.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMemory, Short-TermBrainCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeuropsychological TestsOxidative StressPrefrontal CortexProspective StudiesCancerfMRIWorking memory

Identifiers

PMID32710338
PMCPMC7855199
OpenAlexW3045092791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.