Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710279›Full record

ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2020

Inter-laboratory study of an optimised peptide mapping workflow using automated trypsin digestion for monitoring monoclonal antibody product quality attributes.

Silvia Millán-Martín, Craig Jakes, Sara Carillo, Tom Buchanan, Marc Guender, Dan Bach Kristensen, Trine Meiborg Sloth, Martin Ørgaard, Ken Cook, Jonathan Bones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development of a comprehensive approach for performance evaluation of a quantitative multi-attribute method as a quality control method.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Silvia Millán-MartínCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Fosters Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, A94 X099, Ireland.
Craig JakesCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Fosters Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, A94 X099, Ireland.
Sara CarilloCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Fosters Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, A94 X099, Ireland.
Tom BuchananThermo Fisher Scientific, Tudor Rd, Runcorn, WA7 1TA, UK.
Marc GuenderThermo Fisher Scientific, Reinach TechCenter, Neuhofstrasse 11, 4153, Basel, Switzerland.
Dan Bach KristensenSymphogen, Pederstrupvej 93, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark.
Trine Meiborg SlothSymphogen, Pederstrupvej 93, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark.
Martin ØrgaardSymphogen, Pederstrupvej 93, 2750, Ballerup, Denmark.
Ken CookThermo Fisher Scientific, Stafford House, 1 Boundary Park, Hemel Hempstead, HP2 7GE, UK.
Jonathan BonesCharacterisation and Comparability Laboratory, National Institute for Bioprocessing Research and Training, Fosters Avenue, Mount Merrion, Blackrock, Co., Dublin, A94 X099, Ireland. jonathan.bones@nibrt.ie.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide mapping analysis is a regulatory expectation to verify the primary structure of a recombinant product sequence and to monitor post-translational modifications (PTMs). Although proteolytic digestion has been used for decades, it remains a labour-intensive procedure that can be challenging to accurately reproduce. Here, we describe a fast and reproducible protocol for protease digestion that is automated using immobilised trypsin on magnetic beads, which has been incorporated into an optimised peptide mapping workflow to show method transferability across laboratories. The complete workflow has the potential for use within a multi-attribute method (MAM) approach in drug development, production and QC laboratories. The sample preparation workflow is simple, ideally suited to inexperienced operators and has been extensively studied to show global applicability and robustness for mAbs by performing sample digestion and LC-MS analysis at four independent sites in Europe. LC-MS/MS along with database searching was used to characterise the protein and determine relevant product quality attributes (PQAs) for further testing. A list of relevant critical quality attributes (CQAs) was then established by creating a peptide workbook containing the specific mass-to-charge (m/z) ratios of the modified and unmodified peptides of the selected CQAs, to be monitored in a subsequent test using LC-MS analysis. Data is provided that shows robust digestion efficiency and low levels of protocol induced PTMs. Graphical abstract.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAutomationChromatography, LiquidPeptide MappingTandem Mass SpectrometryTrypsinAntibodies, MonoclonalTrypsinInter-laboratory studyMethod transferabilityMonoclonal antibodyPeptide mappingPost-translational modifications (PTMs)Trypsin digestion

Identifiers

PMID32710279
PMCPMC7496030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.