Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710254›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2021

Incidence of acute postoperative robotic port-site hernias: results from a high-volume multispecialty center.

Tanuja Damani, Les James, Jason C Fisher, Paresh C Shah

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Robotic eTEP inguinal hernia repair.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Thoughts on Trocar Site Hernia Prevention. A Narrative Review.Journal of abdominal wall surgery : JAWS · 2022
    Review
  11. Robotic DIEP Patient Selection: Analysis of CT Angiography.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tanuja DamaniDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Robert I. Grossman School of Medicine, 530 First Ave, HCC Building, Suite 6 C, New York, NY, 10016, USA. Tanuja.damani@nyulangone.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1699-6370
Les JamesDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Robert I. Grossman School of Medicine, 530 First Ave, HCC Building, Suite 6 C, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
Jason C FisherDivision of Pediatric Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Robert I. Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Paresh C ShahDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, NYU Robert I. Grossman School of Medicine, 530 First Ave, HCC Building, Suite 6 C, New York, NY, 10016, USA.
New York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fascial closure at 8-mm robotic port sites continues to be controversial. As the use of the robotic platform increases across multiple abdominal specialties, there are more case reports describing reoperation and small bowel resection for acute port-site hernias. A retrospective review of all robotic abdominal surgeries performed from 2012 to 2019 at NYU Langone Medical Center was conducted. Patients who had a reoperation in our facility within 30 days were identified, and medical records reviewed for indications for reoperation and findings. The study included 11,566 patients, of which 82 patients (0.71%) underwent a reoperation related to the index robotic surgery within 30 days. Fifteen of 11,566 patients (0.13%) had acute port-site hernias, and 3 of these 15 patients required small bowel resection. Eleven of 15 acute port-site hernias (73%) were at 8-mm robotic port site, 2 of which required a small bowel resection. More than a third of the patients had a hernia at an 8-mm port site where a surgical drain had been placed. Considering that each robotic case, regardless of specialty, has three ports at a minimum, the true incidence of acute postoperative robotic port-site hernia is 0.032% (11/34,698), with the incidence of concomitant small bowel resection being 0.006% (2/34,698). The incidence of acute port-site hernias from 8-mm robotic ports is exceedingly low across specialties. Our results do not support routine fascial closure at 8-mm robotic port sites due to an extremely low incidence. However, drain sites require special consideration.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedDigestive System Surgical ProceduresFemaleHerniaHerniorrhaphyHumansIncidenceIntestine, SmallMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsReoperationRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresPort-site herniaReoperationRobotic SurgerySmall bowel resection

Identifiers

PMID32710254
OpenAlexW3044382778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.