Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710210›Full record

ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2020

Use of translational modeling and simulation for quantitative comparison of PF-06804103, a new generation HER2 ADC, with Trastuzumab-DM1.

Alison Betts, Tracey Clark, Paul Jasper, John Tolsma, Piet H van der Graaf, Edmund I Graziani, Edward Rosfjord, Matthew Sung, Dangshe Ma, Frank Barletta

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Research progress on novel antibody drug conjugates in cancer therapy.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences · 2024
    Review
  8. Clinical perspective: Antibody-drug conjugates for the treatment of HER2-positive breast cancer.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Alison BettsDepartment of Biomedicine Design, Pfizer Inc, 610 Main Street, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA. alison.betts@appliedbiomath.com.ORCID 0000-0003-0848-3230
Tracey ClarkWorldwide Research Procurement, Pfizer Inc, Eastern Point Rd, Groton, CT, 06340, USA.
Paul JasperRES Group, Inc, 75 Second Avenue, Needham, MA, 02494, USA.
John TolsmaRES Group, Inc, 75 Second Avenue, Needham, MA, 02494, USA.
Piet H van der GraafDivision of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology, Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research, 2300 RA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Edmund I GrazianiApertor Labs Inc, 828 Contra Costa Ave, Berkeley, CA, 94707, USA.
Edward RosfjordOncology Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, 10965, USA.
Matthew SungOncology Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, 10965, USA.
Dangshe MaDepartment of Therapeutic Proteins, Regeneron, Tarrytown, NY, 10591, USA.
Frank BarlettaOncology Research & Development, Pfizer Inc, 401 N Middletown Rd, Pearl River, NY, 10965, USA. frank.barletta@pfizer.com.
Pfizer (United States) · USRenewable Energy Systems (United States) · USCentre for Human Drug Research · NLContra Costa County Library · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A modeling and simulation approach was used for quantitative comparison of a new generation HER2 antibody drug conjugate (ADC, PF-06804103) with trastuzumab-DM1 (T-DM1). To compare preclinical efficacy, the pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) relationship of PF-06804103 and T-DM1 was determined across a range of mouse tumor xenograft models, using a tumor growth inhibition model. The tumor static concentration was assigned as the minimal efficacious concentration. PF-06804103 was concluded to be more potent than T-DM1 across cell lines studied. TSCs ranged from 1.0 to 9.8 µg/mL (n = 7) for PF-06804103 and from 4.7 to 29 µg/mL (n = 5) for T-DM1. Two experimental models which were resistant to T-DM1, responded to PF-06804103 treatment. A mechanism-based target mediated drug disposition (TMDD) model was used to predict the human PK of PF-06804103. This model was constructed and validated based on T-DM1 which has non-linear PK at doses administered in the clinic, driven by binding to shed HER2. Non-linear PK is predicted for PF-06804103 in the clinic and is dependent upon circulating HER2 extracellular domain (ECD) concentrations. The models were translated to human and suggested greater efficacy for PF-06804103 compared to T-DM1. In conclusion, a fit-for-purpose translational PK/PD strategy for ADCs is presented and used to compare a new generation HER2 ADC with T-DM1.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCell Line, TumorComputer SimulationDose-Response Relationship, DrugErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunoconjugatesMacaca fascicularisMaleMiceModels, BiologicalNeoplasmsAdo-Trastuzumab EmtansineAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesImmunoconjugatesAntibody drug conjugateHER2OncologyPharmacokineticsPK/PDTranslational modelingTumor static concentration

Identifiers

PMID32710210
PMCPMC7520420
OpenAlexW3044926431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.