Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32710155›Full record

ArticleJournal of mathematical biology2020

The impracticalities of multiplicatively-closed codon models: a retreat to linear alternatives.

Julia A Shore, Jeremy G Sumner, Barbara R Holland

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mathematical biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Julia A ShoreUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia. julia.shore@utas.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-3197-0857
Jeremy G SumnerUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Barbara R HollandUniversity of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A matrix Lie algebra is a linear space of matrices closed under the operation [Formula: see text]. The "Lie closure" of a set of matrices is the smallest matrix Lie algebra which contains the set. In the context of Markov chain theory, if a set of rate matrices form a Lie algebra, their corresponding Markov matrices are closed under matrix multiplication; this has been found to be a useful property in phylogenetics. Inspired by previous research involving Lie closures of DNA models, it was hypothesised that finding the Lie closure of a codon model could help to solve the problem of mis-estimation of the non-synonymous/synonymous rate ratio, [Formula: see text]. We propose two different methods of finding a linear space from a model: the first is the linear closure which is the smallest linear space which contains the model, and the second is the linear version which changes multiplicative constraints in the model to additive ones. For each of these linear spaces we then find the Lie closures of them. Under both methods, it was found that closed codon models would require thousands of parameters, and that any partial solution to this problem that was of a reasonable size violated stochasticity. Investigation of toy models indicated that finding the Lie closure of matrix linear spaces which deviated only slightly from a simple model resulted in a Lie closure that was close to having the maximum number of parameters possible. Given that Lie closures are not practical, we propose further consideration of the two variants of linearly closed models.

Indexed as

CodonDNAModels, BiologicalMarkov ChainsPhylogenyCodonDNALie algebraMarkov chainSynonymous/non-synonymous rate ratio

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.