Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709982›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

A novel therapeutic antibody screening method using bacterial high-content imaging reveals functional antibody binding phenotypes of Escherichia coli ST131.

Mailis Maes, Zoe A Dyson, Sarah E Smith, David A Goulding, Catherine Ludden, Stephen Baker, Paul Kellam, Stephen T Reece, Gordon Dougan, Josefin Bartholdson Scott

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Loss of O-antigen due toScience advances · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mailis MaesDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Zoe A DysonDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Sarah E SmithKymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK.
David A GouldingWellcome Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK.
Catherine LuddenLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Stephen BakerDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Paul KellamKymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Stephen T ReeceKymab Ltd, Babraham Research Campus, Cambridge, UK.
Gordon DouganDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
Josefin Bartholdson ScottDepartment of Medicine, Cambridge Institute for Therapeutic Immunology & Infectious Disease, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. jb2143@cam.ac.uk.
University of Cambridge · GBKymab (United Kingdom) · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBWellcome Sanger Institute · GB

Funding

Department of HealthMedical Research Council MC_PC_17185Wellcome Trust 110243/Z/15/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increase of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), and lack of new classes of licensed antimicrobials, have made alternative treatment options for AMR pathogens increasingly attractive. Recent studies have demonstrated anti-bacterial efficacy of a humanised monoclonal antibody (mAb) targeting the O25b O-antigen of Escherichia coli ST131. To evaluate the phenotypic effects of antibody binding to diverse clinical E. coli ST131 O25b bacterial isolates in high-throughput, we designed a novel mAb screening method using high-content imaging (HCI) and image-based morphological profiling to screen a mAb targeting the O25b O-antigen. Screening the antibody against a panel of 86 clinical E. coli ST131 O25:H4 isolates revealed 4 binding phenotypes: no binding (18.60%), weak binding (4.65%), strong binding (69.77%) and strong agglutinating binding (6.98%). Impaired antibody binding could be explained by the presence of insertion sequences or mutations in O-antigen or lipopolysaccharide core biosynthesis genes, affecting the amount, structure or chain length of the O-antigen. The agglutinating binding phenotype was linked with lower O-antigen density, enhanced antibody-mediated phagocytosis and increased serum susceptibly. This study highlights the need to screen candidate mAbs against large panels of clinically relevant isolates, and that HCI can be used to evaluate mAb binding affinity and potential functional efficacy against AMR bacteria.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsFeasibility StudiesHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansInterspersed Repetitive SequencesMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopy, ElectronO AntigensPhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotideVirulenceAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedO Antigens

Identifiers

PMID32709982
PMCPMC7382476
OpenAlexW3044729281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.