Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709966›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

The potential for a CRISPR gene drive to eradicate or suppress globally invasive social wasps.

Philip J Lester, Mariana Bulgarella, James W Baty, Peter K Dearden, Joseph Guhlin, John M Kean

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evo-devo and the Biodiversity Crisis.Results and problems in cell differentiation · 2026
    Article
  5. Why just fly?Fly · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Genes drive organisms and slippery slopes.Pathogens and global health · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Philip J LesterSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand. Phil.Lester@vuw.ac.nz.
Mariana BulgarellaSchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
James W BatySchool of Biological Sciences, Victoria University of Wellington, PO Box 600, Wellington, New Zealand.
Peter K DeardenGenomics Aotearoa and Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Joseph GuhlinGenomics Aotearoa and Biochemistry Department, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
John M KeanAgResearch Limited, Hamilton, 3240, New Zealand.
Victoria University of Wellington · NZUniversity of Otago · NZAgResearch · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR gene drives have potential for widespread and cost-efficient pest control, but are highly controversial. We examined a potential gene drive targeting spermatogenesis to control the invasive common wasp (Vespula vulgaris) in New Zealand. Vespula wasps are haplodiploid. Their life cycle makes gene drive production challenging, as nests are initiated by single fertilized queens in spring followed by several cohorts of sterile female workers and the production of reproductives in autumn. We show that different spermatogenesis genes have different levels of variation between introduced and native ranges, enabling a potential 'precision drive' that could target the reduced genetic diversity and genotypes within the invaded range. In vitro testing showed guide-RNA target specificity and efficacy that was dependent on the gene target within Vespula, but no cross-reactivity in other Hymenoptera. Mathematical modelling incorporating the genetic and life history traits of Vespula wasps identified characteristics for a male sterility drive to achieve population control. There was a trade-off between drive infiltration and impact: a drive causing complete male sterility would not spread, while partial sterility could be effective in limiting population size if the homing rate is high. Our results indicate that gene drives may offer viable suppression for wasps and other haplodiploid pests.

Indexed as

Gene Drive TechnologyIntroduced SpeciesAnimalsCRISPR-Cas SystemsInternationalityPest Control, BiologicalPopulation DynamicsWasps

Identifiers

PMID32709966
PMCPMC7382497
OpenAlexW3044903140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.