Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709958›Full record

ReviewEye (London, England)2021

Refractive surgery beyond 2020.

Marcus Ang, Damien Gatinel, Dan Z Reinstein, Erik Mertens, Jorge L Alió Del Barrio, Jorge L Alió

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 178 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Observational
  20. Article

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Marcus AngSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore. marcus.ang@snec.com.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3022-0795
Damien GatinelRothschild Foundation, 29 rue Manin, Paris, France.
Dan Z ReinsteinLondon Vision Clinic, London, UK.
Erik MertensMedipolis-Antwerp Private Clinic, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jorge L Alió Del BarrioDivision of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
Jorge L AlióDivision of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Universidad Miguel Hernández, Alicante, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESFondation de Rothschild · FRSingapore National Eye Center · SGUniversity of Ulster · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Refractive surgery refers to any procedure that corrects or minimizes refractive errors. Today, refractive surgery has evolved beyond the traditional laser refractive surgery, embodied by the popular laser in situ keratomileusis or 'LASIK'. New keratorefractive techniques such as small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) avoids corneal flap creation and uses a single laser device, while advances in surface ablation techniques have seen a resurgence in its popularity. Presbyopic treatment options have also expanded to include new ablation profiles, intracorneal implants, and phakic intraocular implants. With the improved safety and efficacy of refractive lens exchange, a wider variety of intraocular lens implants with advanced optics provide more options for refractive correction in carefully selected patients. In this review, we also discuss possible developments in refractive surgery beyond 2020, such as preoperative evaluation of refractive patients using machine learning and artificial intelligence, potential use of stromal lenticules harvested from SMILE for presbyopic treatments, and various advances in intraocular lens implants that may provide a closer to 'physiological correction' of refractive errors.

Indexed as

Keratomileusis, Laser In SituRefractive ErrorsArtificial IntelligenceCorneaHumansLasers, ExcimerLens Implantation, Intraocular

Identifiers

PMID32709958
PMCPMC8027012
OpenAlexW3045072165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.