Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709926›Full record

ReviewCellular & molecular immunology2020

Ligand recognition by the γδ TCR and discrimination between homeostasis and stress conditions.

Malte Deseke, Immo Prinz

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cellular & molecular immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 104 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
104citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

104 citing papers in PubMed, 162 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. γδ T cells and cancer.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Oligoclonal expansion of atypical Vδ2Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing of Thyroid Tissues Reveals Pathogenesis of Graves' Disease.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Malte DesekeInstitute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Immo PrinzInstitute of Immunology, Hannover Medical School, 30625, Hannover, Germany. prinz.immo@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8789-9578
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

T lymphocytes comprise cells expressing either an αβ or a γδ TCR. The riddle how αβ TCRs are triggered by specific peptides presented in the context of MHC was elucidated some time ago. In contrast, the mechanisms that underlie antigen recognition by γδ TCRs are still baffling the scientific community. It is clear that activation of γδ TCRs does not necessarily depend on MHC antigen presentation. To date, diverse and largely host-cell-derived molecules have been identified as cognate antigens for the γδ TCR. However, for most γδ TCRs, the activating ligand is still unknown and many open questions with regard to physiological relevance and generalizable concepts remain. Especially the question of how γδ T cells can distinguish homeostatic from stress conditions via their TCR remains largely unresolved. Recent discoveries in the field might have paved the way towards a better understanding of antigen recognition by the γδ TCR and have made it conceivable to revise the current knowledge and contextualize the new findings.

Indexed as

HomeostasisStress, PhysiologicalAnimalsAntigensHumansLigandsModels, BiologicalReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaAntigensLigandsReceptors, Antigen, T-Cell, gamma-deltaantigen recognitiongamma-delta TCRligands

Identifiers

PMID32709926
PMCPMC7608190
OpenAlexW3043933877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.