Trial reportJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2020
Clinical outcomes of prexasertib monotherapy in recurrent
Trial report in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Trial
- Genome instability and crosstalk with the immune response.Genome medicine · 2025Review
- Antitumor Activity of Radiation Therapy Combined with Checkpoint Kinase Inhibition in SHH/International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Immunosuppressive mechanisms and therapeutic targeting of regulatory T cells in ovarian cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- cGAS/STING signaling pathway in gynecological malignancies: From molecular mechanisms to therapeutic values.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup CA125 response has a high negative predictive value for CHK1 inhibitor RECIST response in recurrent ovarian cancer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Emerging mechanisms and implications of cGAS-STING signaling in cancer immunotherapy strategies.Cancer biology & medicine · 2024Review
- Upregulation of ZMAT3 is Associated with the Poor Prognosis of Breast Cancer.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
- Could Inhibiting the DNA Damage Repair Checkpoint Rescue Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor-Resistant Endometrial Cancer?Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Comparative landscape of genetic dependencies in human and chimpanzee stem cells.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- Inhibition of Chk2 promotes neuroprotection, axon regeneration, and functional recovery after CNS injury.Science advances · 2022Article
- cGAS/STING cross-talks with cell cycle and potentiates cancer immunotherapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2022Review
- Identification of the Immune Signatures for Ovarian Cancer Based on the Tumor Immune Microenvironment Genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022Article
- Immune modulating activity of the CHK1 inhibitor prexasertib and anti-PD-L1 antibody LY3300054 in patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancer and other solid tumors.Cancer immunology, immunotherapy : CII · 2021Article
- Novel Insights into the Molecular Regulation of Ribonucleotide Reductase in Adrenocortical Carcinoma Treatment.Cancers · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPreclinical data suggest cell cycle checkpoint blockade may induce an immunostimulatory tumor microenvironment. However, it remains elusive whether immunomodulation occurs in the clinical setting. To test this, we used blood and fresh tissue samples collected at baseline and post therapy from a phase II trial of the cell cycle checkpoint 1 inhibitor (CHK1i) prexasertib in recurrent ovarian cancer.
methodsPaired blood samples and fresh core biopsies, taken before treatment was started at baseline (cycle 1 day 1 (C1D1)) and post second dose on day 15 of cycle 1 (C1D15), were collected. To evaluate changes in the immune responses after treatment, multiparametric flow cytometry for DNA damage markers and immune cell subsets was performed on paired blood samples. RNA sequencing (RNAseq) of paired core biopsies was also analyzed. Archival tissue immune microenvironment was evaluated with immunohistochemistry. All correlative study statistical analyses used two-sided significance with a cut-off of p=0.05.
resultsFlow cytometric analysis showed significantly increased γ-H2AX staining after CHK1i treatment, accompanied by increased monocyte populations, suggestive of an activated innate immune response (median 31.6% vs 45.6%, p=0.005). Increased expressions of immunocompetence marker HLA-DR (Human Leukocyte Antigen DR antigen) on monocytes and of
conclusionOur study demonstrates that a favorable clinical response in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients treated with CHK1i is possibly associated with enhanced innate and adaptive immunity, requiring further mechanistic studies. It is supportive of current efforts for a clinical development strategy for therapeutic combinations with immunotherapy in ovarian cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.