Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709648›Full record

SynthesisBMJ open2020

Women's satisfaction with existing labour and delivery services in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asmamaw Demis, Addisu Getie, Adam Wondmieneh, Melaku Bimerew, Birhan Alemnew, Getnet Gedefaw

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence and risk factors of maternal dissatisfaction after vaginal delivery: A multicenter prospective study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The anesthesiologist and the dissatisfied patient.Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier)
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Asmamaw DemisNursing, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Addisu GetieNursing, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Adam WondmienehNursing, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Melaku BimerewNursing, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.
Birhan AlemnewMedical Laboratory Sciences, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia.ORCID 0000-0003-1066-9798
Getnet GedefawMidwifery, Woldia University, Woldia, Ethiopia gedefawget@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4906-2555
Woldia University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo estimate the pooled prevalence of women's satisfaction with existing labour and delivery services in Ethiopia.

designSystematic review and meta-analysis.

methodsMEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Hinari, Google Scholar and web of science electronic databases were searched for the study. This meta-analysis included nineteen cross-sectional studies. Cochrane I

resultNineteen studies were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of women's satisfaction with existing labour and delivery services in Ethiopia was 70.54% (95% CI 60.94 to 80.15). Having informal education of the women (adjusted OR (AOR)=2.19; 95% CI 1.47 to 3.25), time to be seen by the healthcare providers within 20 min (AOR=2.97; 95% CI 2.11 to 4.19), receiving free service (AOR=5.01; 95% CI 2.87 to 8.75), keeping women privacy (AOR=2.84; 95% CI 1.46 to 5.55), planned delivery in the health institution (AOR=2.85; 95% CI 1.99 to 4.07), duration of labour within 12 hours (AOR=2.55; 95% CI 1.70 to 3.81) and have not antenatal care follow-up (AOR=4.03; 95% CI 2.21 to 7.35) were factors associated with women satisfaction with labour and delivery services in Ethiopia.

conclusionThe pooled prevalence of women's satisfaction with existing labour and delivery services was high. Informal education of the women, antenatal care follow-up, planned delivery in the health institution, keeping women privacy, getting free service, time to be seen by the healthcare providers and duration of labour were factors associated with women's satisfaction during labour and delivery services. This finding is important to design strategic policies and to prevent emergency neonatal and women complications during the childbirth and postpartum periods. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020149217.

Indexed as

Personal SatisfactionPrenatal CareChildCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyepidemiologymaternal medicinepublic health

Identifiers

PMID32709648
PMCPMC7380852
OpenAlexW3043879961

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.