Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709640›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Berkson's bias in biobank sampling in a specialised mental health care setting: a comparative cross-sectional study.

Vincent Laliberté, Charles-Edouard Giguère, Stéphane Potvin, Alain Lesage, Signature Consortium

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Vincent LalibertéDepartment of Psychiatry, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada vincent.laliberte@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-7601
Charles-Edouard GiguèreCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Stéphane PotvinCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Alain LesageCentre de recherche de l'Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Signature Consortium

Funding

Canadian Institute of Health Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether studying aetiological pathways of depression, in particular the well-established determinant of childhood trauma, only in a specialised mental healthcare setting can yield biased estimates of the aetiological association, given that the majority of individuals are treated in primary care settings. DESIGN AND

settingTwo databanks were used in this study. The Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) on Mental Health and Well-Being 2012 is a national survey about mental health of adult Canadians. It measured common mental disorders and utilisation of services. The Signature mental health biobank includes adults from the Island of Montreal recruited at the emergency department of a major university mental health centre. After consent, participants filled standardised psychosocial questionnaires, gave blood samples, and their clinical diagnosis was recorded. We compared the cohort of depressed individuals from CCHS and Signature in contact with specialised services with those in contact with primary care or not in treatment.

participantsThere were 860 participants with depression in the CCHS and 207 participants with depression in the Signature Bank. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The Childhood Experiences of Violence Questionnaire was used to measure childhood trauma in both settings. Childhood trauma is associated with depression as with other common mental and physical disorders.

resultsIndividuals with depression in the CCHS who reported having been hospitalised for psychiatric treatment or having seen a psychiatrist or those from Signature were found to be more strongly associated with childhood abuse than individuals with depression who were treated in primary care settings or did not seek mental healthcare in the preceding year.

conclusionsBerkson's bias limits the generalisability of aetiological associations observed in such university-hospital-based biobanks, but the problem can be remedied by broadening recruitment to primary care settings and the general population.

Indexed as

Adult Survivors of Child AbuseBiasAcademic Medical CentersAdultAgedCanadaCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualDepressionEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMaleMiddle Agedadult psychiatrydepression & mood disordersepidemiologyorganisation of health servicespsychiatrystatistics & research methods

Identifiers

PMID32709640
PMCPMC7380858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.