Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709233›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2020

Goals of care or goals of life? A qualitative study of clinicians' and patients' experiences of hospital discharge using Patient-Oriented Discharge Summaries (PODS).

Nayantara Hattangadi, Paul Kurdyak, Rachel Solomon, Sophie Soklaridis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nayantara HattangadiCenter for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, 2nd floor, room 2059, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Paul KurdyakCenter for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, 2nd floor, room 2059, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Rachel SolomonThe Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, M5S 1S2, Canada.
Sophie SoklaridisCenter for Addiction and Mental Health, 33 Russell Street, 2nd floor, room 2059, Toronto, ON, Canada. sophie.soklaridis@camh.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5119-8473

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecognizing the need for improved communication with patients at the point of hospital discharge, a group of clinicians, patients, and designers in Toronto, Canada collaborated to develop a standardized tool known as the Patient-Oriented Discharge Summary (PODS). Although quantitative results suggest PODS helps mitigate gaps in knowledge, a qualitative inquiry from the clinician and patient perspective of psychiatric hospital discharge using PODS has not been widely explored. Our aim was to explore clinicians' and patients' experiences with PODS.

methodsWe used a qualitative thematic analysis to explore clinicians' (n = 10) and patients' (n = 6) experiences with PODS. We used convenience sampling to identify and invite potential participants at the Center for Addiction and Mental Health in Toronto, Canada to participate in semi-structured interviews between February 2019 and September 2019. Data were analyzed using a thematic analysis approach to develop descriptive themes.

resultsEmerging themes from the data between clinicians and patients were both different and complementary. Clinicians described PODS using the concept of "goals of care." They relayed their experiences with PODS as a discrete event and emphasized its role in meeting their "goals of care" for discharge planning. Patients provided more of a "goals of life" perspective on recovery. They characterized PODS as only one facet of their recovery journey and not necessarily as a discrete or memorable event. Patients focused on their outcomes post-discharge and situated their experiences with PODS through its relation to their overall recovery.

conclusionsPODS was experienced differently by clinicians and patients. Clinicians experienced PODS as helpful in orienting them to the fulfillment of goals of care. Patients did not experience PODS as a particularly memorable intervention. Due to the information advantage that clinicians have about PODS, it is not surprising that clinicians and patients experienced the PODS differently. This study expanded our understanding of hospital discharge from clinicians and patients perspectives, and suggests that there are additional areas that need improvement.

Indexed as

Patient DischargePatient Discharge SummariesCanadaGoalsHospitals, PsychiatricHumansPatientsPhysiciansQualitative ResearchDischarge planningMental healthPatient experienceProvider experienceQualitative researchQuality improvement

Identifiers

PMID32709233
PMCPMC7379793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.