Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709106›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Effectiveness of Internet- and Mobile-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Reduce Suicidal Ideation and Behaviors: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Individual Participant Data.

Rebekka Büscher, Marie Beisemann, Philipp Doebler, Lena Steubl, Matthias Domhardt, Pim Cuijpers, Ad Kerkhof, Lasse B Sander

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rebekka BüscherDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8931-0942
Marie BeisemannDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6977-167X
Philipp DoeblerDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, 44227 Dortmund, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2946-8526
Lena SteublDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8508-5271
Matthias DomhardtDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Ulm University, 89069 Ulm, Germany.
Pim CuijpersDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5497-2743
Ad KerkhofDepartment of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Lasse B SanderDepartment of Rehabilitation Psychology and Psychotherapy, Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Internet- and mobile-based cognitive behavioral therapy (iCBT) might reduce suicidal ideation. However, recent meta-analyses found small effect sizes, and it remains unclear whether specific subgroups of participants experience beneficial or harmful effects. This is the study protocol for an individual participant meta-analysis (IPD-MA) aiming to determine the effectiveness of iCBT on suicidal ideation and identify moderators. We will systematically search CENTRAL, PsycINFO, Embase, and Pubmed for randomized controlled trials examining guided or self-guided iCBT for suicidality. All types of control conditions are eligible. Participants experiencing suicidal ideation will be included irrespective of age, diagnoses, or co-interventions. We will conduct a one-stage IPD-MA with suicidal ideation as the primary outcome, using a continuous measure, reliable improvement and deterioration, and response rate. Moderator analyses will be performed on participant-, study-, and intervention-level. Two independent reviewers will assess risk of bias and the quality of evidence using Cochrane's Risk of Bias Tool 2 and GRADE. This review was registered with OSF and is currently in progress. The IPD-MA will provide effect estimates while considering covariates and will offer novel insights into differential effects on a participant level. This will help to develop more effective, safe, and tailored digital treatment options for suicidal individuals.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapySuicidal IdeationHumansInternetMeta-Analysis as TopicSystematic Reviews as Topiccognitive behavioral therapyiCBTindividual participant data meta-analysisinternet-basedmobile-basedonlinereviewsuicidal ideationsuicide

Identifiers

PMID32709106
PMCPMC7399870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.