Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709053›Full record

ArticleMetabolites2020

Application of Multiblock Analysis on Small Metabolomic Multi-Tissue Dataset.

Frida Torell, Tomas Skotare, Johan Trygg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metabolites, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Frida TorellComputational Life Science Cluster (CLiC), Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.
Tomas SkotareComputational Life Science Cluster (CLiC), Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8445-0559
Johan TryggComputational Life Science Cluster (CLiC), Department of Chemistry, Umeå University, 90187 Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions no. 238821Vetenskapsrådet 2016-04376Vetenskapsrådet eSSENCE
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Data integration has been proven to provide valuable information. The information extracted using data integration in the form of multiblock analysis can pinpoint both common and unique trends in the different blocks. When working with small multiblock datasets the number of possible integration methods is drastically reduced. To investigate the application of multiblock analysis in cases where one has a few number of samples and a lack of statistical power, we studied a small metabolomic multiblock dataset containing six blocks (i.e., tissue types), only including common metabolites. We used a single model multiblock analysis method called the joint and unique multiblock analysis (JUMBA) and compared it to a commonly used method, concatenated principal component analysis (PCA). These methods were used to detect trends in the dataset and identify underlying factors responsible for metabolic variations. Using JUMBA, we were able to interpret the extracted components and link them to relevant biological properties. JUMBA shows how the observations are related to one another, the stability of these relationships, and to what extent each of the blocks contribute to the components. These results indicate that multiblock methods can be useful even with a small number of samples.

Indexed as

data integrationjoint and unique multiblock analysis (JUMBA)metabolomicsmultiblockmultiblock orthogonal component analysis (MOCA)multi-tissueOnPLS

Identifiers

PMID32709053
PMCPMC7407932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.