ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Myocardial
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 35 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity associated with myocardial energy metabolism: mechanisms revealed through an integration ofFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Trial
- Multi-modality deep learning-based [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024Trial
- Predictive value of left ventricularAnnals of nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- An innovative hybrid imaging protocol for whole-bodyCardio-oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- The Imaging Value ofMolecular imaging and biology · 2025Article
- Review
- A Feasibility Study of [Molecular imaging and biology · 2024Article
- Focal myocardialQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Positron emission tomography combined with serum biomarkers detects fibrotic MASH.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- A feasibility study of [18F]F-AraG positron emission tomography (PET) for cardiac imaging - myocardial viability in ischemia-reperfusion injury model.Research square · 2024Article
- Review
- Sialylated Glycan Bindings from SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein to Blood and Endothelial Cells Govern the Severe Morbidities of COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Tales from the future-nuclear cardio-oncology, from prediction to diagnosis and monitoring.European heart journal. Cardiovascular Imaging · 2023Review
- Severe myocardial ischemia detected in routine oncological positron emission tomography/computed tomography with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose.European heart journal · 2023Article
- Article
- Anthracycline cardiotoxicity: current methods of diagnosis and possible role ofCardio-oncology (London, England) · 2023Review
- Imaging of heart disease in women: review and case presentation.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2022Review
- Opportunistic deep learning powered calcium scoring in oncologic patients with very high coronary artery calcium (≥ 1000) undergoing 18F-FDG PET/CT.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Diagnostic Value of Fully Automated Artificial Intelligence Powered Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring from 18F-FDG PET/CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Heart and bladder detection and segmentation on FDG PET/CT by deep learning.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePositron emission tomography/computed tomography with
methodsMyocardial
resultsAmong all patients, 109 (36.1%) displayed no myocardial
conclusionsFocal myocardial
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.