Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32709021›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Dietary Intake and Nitrogen Balance in British Army Infantry Recruits Undergoing Basic Training.

Shaun Chapman, Alex J Rawcliffe, Rachel Izard, Kimberley Jacka, Hayley Tyson, Lee Smith, Justin Roberts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shaun ChapmanHQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, Wiltshire SN9 6BE, UK.
Alex J RawcliffeHQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, Wiltshire SN9 6BE, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0942-7185
Rachel IzardDefence Science and Technology, Porton Down, UK Ministry of Defence, Salisbury, Wiltshire SP4 0JQ, UK.
Kimberley JackaHQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, Wiltshire SN9 6BE, UK.
Hayley TysonHQ Army Recruiting and Initial Training Command, UK Ministry of Defence, Upavon, Wiltshire SN9 6BE, UK.
Lee SmithCambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5340-9833
Justin RobertsCambridge Centre for Sport and Exercise Sciences, School of Psychology and Sport Science, Anglia Ruskin University, East Road, Cambridge CB1 1PT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3169-2041

Funding

Ministry of Defence no grant number
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We assessed dietary intake and nitrogen balance during 14 weeks of Basic Training (BT) in British Army Infantry recruits. Nineteen men (mean ± SD: age 19.9 ± 2.6 years, height: 175.7 ± 6.5 cm, body mass 80.3 ± 10.1 kg) at the Infantry Training Centre, Catterick (ITC(C)) volunteered. Nutrient intakes and 24-h urinary nitrogen balance were assessed in weeks 2, 6 and 11 of BT. Nutrient intake was assessed using researcher-led weighed food records and food diaries, and Nutritics professional dietary software. Data were compared between weeks using a repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with statistical significance set at

Indexed as

DietExerciseMilitary PersonnelAdolescentAdultBody HeightBody Mass IndexBody WeightDietary ProteinsDiet RecordsEatingEnglandHumansNitrogenNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentDietary ProteinsNitrogendietary intakemilitarynitrogen balanceproteintraining

Identifiers

PMID32709021
PMCPMC7400853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.