Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708933›Full record

ReviewFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Safety of Probiotics: Functional Fruit Beverages and Nutraceuticals.

Irena Žuntar, Zvonimir Petric, Danijela Bursać Kovačević, Predrag Putnik

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05719649 (The Efficacy of NTU 101 Lactic Acid Bacteria Powder in the Adjuvant Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis - A Double-blind, Multi-center Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05719649 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

The Efficacy of NTU 101 Lactic Acid Bacteria Powder in the Adjuvant Improvement of Atopic Dermatitis - A Double-blind, Multi-center Randomized, Placebo-controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorSunWay Biotech Co., LTD.Ran2023 to 2023Enrolled72ConditionsAtopic Dermatitis, Atopic Dermatitis EczemaArmsLactic acid bacteria NTU 101, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Extracellular Vesicles fromPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Irena ŽuntarFaculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Ante Kovačića 1, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Zvonimir PetricUnit of Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Department of Pharmacology at the Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, 40530 Göteborg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-2127-8605
Danijela Bursać KovačevićFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0002-6829-6472
Predrag PutnikFaculty of Food Technology and Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Pierottijeva 6, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.ORCID 0000-0003-0342-6114

Funding

Hrvatska Zaklada za Znanost IP-2019-04-2105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Over the last decade, fruit juice consumption has increased. Their rise in popularity can be attributed to the belief that they are a quick way to consuming a dietary portion of fruit. Probiotics added to fruit juices produce various bioactive compounds, thus probiotic fruit juices can be considered as a new type of functional foods. Such combinations could improve nutritional properties and provide health benefits of fruit juices, due to delivering positive health attributes from both sources (fruit juices and probiotics). However, this review discusses the other side of the same coin, i.e., the one that challenges general beliefs that probiotics are undoubtedly safe. This topic deserves more acknowledgments from the medical and nutritional literature, as it is highly important for health care professionals and nutritionists who must be aware of potential probiotic issues. Still, clinical trials have not adequately questioned the safety of probiotics, as they are generally considered safe. Therefore, this reviews aims to give an evidence-based perspective of probiotic safety, focusing on probiotic fruit beverages and nutraceuticals, by providing documented clinical case reports and studies. Finally, the paper deals with some additional insights from the pharmacological and toxicological point of views, such as pharmacological repercussions of probiotics on health.

Indexed as

functional food industryfunctional fruit juicespathogenicitypharmacological interactionsprobiotic safetytoxicity

Identifiers

PMID32708933
PMCPMC7404568

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.