Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708924›Full record

ReviewSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

A Review of Gait Phase Detection Algorithms for Lower Limb Prostheses.

Huong Thi Thu Vu, Dianbiao Dong, Hoang-Long Cao, Tom Verstraten, Dirk Lefeber, Bram Vanderborght, Joost Geeroms

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. A Low-Cost Instrumented Shoe System for Gait Phase Detection Based on Foot Plantar Pressure Data.IEEE journal of translational engineering in health and medicine · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Huong Thi Thu VuRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-8512-2784
Dianbiao DongRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Hoang-Long CaoRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-2851-5527
Tom VerstratenRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-7398-5398
Dirk LefeberRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Bram VanderborghtRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4881-9341
Joost GeeromsRobotics & Multibody Mechanics Research Group (R & MM), Vrije Universiteit Brussel and Flanders Make, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fast and accurate gait phase detection is essential to achieve effective powered lower-limb prostheses and exoskeletons. As the versatility but also the complexity of these robotic devices increases, the research on how to make gait detection algorithms more performant and their sensing devices smaller and more wearable gains interest. A functional gait detection algorithm will improve the precision, stability, and safety of prostheses, and other rehabilitation devices. In the past years the state-of-the-art has advanced significantly in terms of sensors, signal processing, and gait detection algorithms. In this review, we investigate studies and developments in the field of gait event detection methods, more precisely applied to prosthetic devices. We compared advantages and limitations between all the proposed methods and extracted the relevant questions and recommendations about gait detection methods for future developments.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsExoskeleton DeviceAlgorithmsGaitSignal Processing, Computer-Assistedassistive devicesevent detectiongait phase classificationgait phase detectionIMU sensorlower limb prosthesissmart insolewearable sensors

Identifiers

PMID32708924
PMCPMC7411778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.