Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708715›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Biomechanical Model-Based Development of an Active Occupational Upper-Limb Exoskeleton to Support Healthcare Workers in the Surgery Waiting Room.

Mark Tröster, David Wagner, Felix Müller-Graf, Christophe Maufroy, Urs Schneider, Thomas Bauernhansl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Methodology for the knowledge-based selection of occupational exoskeletons.Production engineering : research and development · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Exoskeletons: A challenge for development.Wearable technologies · 2023
    Review
  11. Model-Based Biomechanical Exoskeleton Concept Optimization for a Representative Lifting Task in Logistics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. A Review of Exoskeletons Considering Nurses.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Critical review on applications and roles of exoskeletons in patient handling.International journal of industrial ergonomics · 2022
    Article
  15. The Effects of a Passive Exoskeleton on Human Thermal Responses in Temperate and Cold Environments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  16. Quantitative Models for Prediction of Cumulative Trauma Disorders Applied to the Maquiladora Industry.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mark TrösterFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9488-0971
David WagnerFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Felix Müller-GrafFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Christophe MaufroyFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Urs SchneiderFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.
Thomas BauernhanslFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Nobelstraße 12, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Occupational ergonomics in healthcare is an increasing challenge we have to handle in the near future. Physical assistive systems, so-called exoskeletons, are promising solutions to prevent work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). Manual handling like pushing, pulling, holding and lifting during healthcare activities require practical and biomechanical effective assistive devices. In this article, a musculoskeletal-model-based development of an assistive exoskeleton is described for manual patient transfer in the surgery waiting room. For that purpose, kinematic data collected with an experimental set-up reproducing real patient transfer conditions are first used to define the kinetic boundary conditions for the model-based development approach. Model-based analysis reveals significant relief potential in the lower back and shoulder area of the musculoskeletal apparatus. This is corroborated by subjective feedback collected during measurements with real surgery assistants. A shoulder-arm exoskeleton design is then proposed, optimized and evaluated within the same simulation framework. The presented results illustrate the potential for the proposed design to reduce significantly joint compressions and muscle activities in the shoulder complex in the considered patient transfer scenarios.

Indexed as

Exoskeleton DeviceErgonomicsHealth PersonnelHumansOccupational DiseasesUpper Extremityergonomicsexoskeletonhealthcaremanual workmusculoskeletal modeling

Identifiers

PMID32708715
PMCPMC7400613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.