Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708663›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Differential Effects of MS Therapeutics on B Cells-Implications for Their Use and Failure in AQP4-Positive NMOSD Patients.

Jan Traub, Silke Häusser-Kinzel, Martin S Weber

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. PlasmaNeurology(R) neuroimmunology & neuroinflammation · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Life history of a brain autoreactive T cell: From thymus through intestine to blood-brain barrier and brain lesion.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2024
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. COVID-19 Vaccination and The Eye.American journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jan TraubDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8092-5967
Silke Häusser-KinzelInstitute for Neuropathology, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Martin S WeberDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Center, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
University of Göttingen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

B cells are considered major contributors to multiple sclerosis (MS) pathophysiology. While lately approved disease-modifying drugs like ocrelizumab deplete B cells directly, most MS medications were not primarily designed to target B cells. Here, we review the current understanding how approved MS medications affect peripheral B lymphocytes in humans. These highly contrasting effects are of substantial importance when considering these drugs as therapy for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), a frequent differential diagnosis to MS, which is considered being a primarily B cell- and antibody-driven diseases. Data indicates that MS medications, which deplete B cells or induce an anti-inflammatory phenotype of the remaining ones, were effective and safe in aquaporin-4 antibody positive NMOSD. In contrast, drugs such as natalizumab and interferon-β, which lead to activation and accumulation of B cells in the peripheral blood, lack efficacy or even induce catastrophic disease activity in NMOSD. Hence, we conclude that the differential effect of MS drugs on B cells is one potential parameter determining the therapeutic efficacy or failure in antibody-dependent diseases like seropositive NMOSD.

Indexed as

AnimalsAquaporin 4B-LymphocytesCell MovementCell ProliferationHumansImmunologic FactorsInterferon-betaMultiple SclerosisNatalizumabNeuromyelitis OpticaAQP4 protein, humanAquaporin 4Immunologic FactorsInterferon-betaNatalizumabalemtuzumabB cellsdimethyl fumaratefingolimodglatiramer acetateinterferon-βmultiple sclerosisnatalizumabneuromyelitis optica spectrum disordersocrelizumab

Identifiers

PMID32708663
PMCPMC7404039
OpenAlexW3042413892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.