Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708602›Full record

ReviewPlants (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Advances in Plant Regeneration: Shake, Rattle and Roll.

Sergio Ibáñez, Elena Carneros, Pilar S Testillano, José Manuel Pérez-Pérez

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sergio IbáñezInstituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1505-6010
Elena CarnerosPollen Biotechnology of Crop Plants Group, Margarita Salas Center of Biological Research, CIB Margarita Salas-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2066-6320
Pilar S TestillanoPollen Biotechnology of Crop Plants Group, Margarita Salas Center of Biological Research, CIB Margarita Salas-CSIC, Ramiro de Maeztu 9, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-4509-7646
José Manuel Pérez-PérezInstituto de Bioingeniería, Universidad Miguel Hernández, 03202 Elche, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2848-4919

Funding

Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana ACIF/2018/220Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana IDIFEDER 2018/016Conselleria de Cultura, Educación y Ciencia, Generalitat Valenciana PROMETEO/2019/117Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España AGL2017-82447-RMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España BIO2015-64255-RMinisterio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España RTI2018-096505-B-I00
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some plant cells are able to rebuild new organs after tissue damage or in response to definite stress treatments and/or exogenous hormone applications. Whole plants can develop through de novo organogenesis or somatic embryogenesis. Recent findings have enlarged our understanding of the molecular and cellular mechanisms required for tissue reprogramming during plant regeneration. Genetic analyses also suggest the key role of epigenetic regulation during de novo plant organogenesis. A deeper understanding of plant regeneration might help us to enhance tissue culture optimization, with multiple applications in plant micropropagation and green biotechnology. In this review, we will provide additional insights into the physiological and molecular framework of plant regeneration, including both direct and indirect de novo organ formation and somatic embryogenesis, and we will discuss the key role of intrinsic and extrinsic constraints for cell reprogramming during plant regeneration.

Indexed as

hormone-induced callusroot tip regenerationsomatic embryogenesisstress-induced microspore embryogenesiswound-induced callus

Identifiers

PMID32708602
PMCPMC7412315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.