Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708521›Full record

ReviewCancers2020

Effect of Flow-Induced Shear Stress in Nanomaterial Uptake by Cells: Focus on Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapy.

Samar Shurbaji, Gulsen G Anlar, Essraa A Hussein, Ahmed Elzatahry, Huseyin C Yalcin

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Bacterial Outer Membrane Vesicle (OMV)-Encapsulated TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Zebrafish as a Model for Anticancer Nanomedicine Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Cancer Nanomedicine.Cancers · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samar ShurbajiMaterials Science and Technology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Gulsen G AnlarCollege of Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Essraa A HusseinMaterials Science and Technology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Ahmed ElzatahryMaterials Science and Technology Department, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.ORCID 0000-0002-7291-5723
Huseyin C YalcinBiomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha 2713, Qatar.
Qatar University · QA

Funding

Qatar University QUST-1-CAS-2019-37
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, nanomedicines have gained a great deal of attention in diverse biomedical applications, including anti-cancer therapy. Being different from normal tissue, the biophysical microenvironment of tumor cells and cancer cell mechanics should be considered for the development of nanostructures as anti-cancer agents. Throughout the last decades, many efforts devoted to investigating the distinct cancer environment and understanding the interactions between tumor cells and have been applied bio-nanomaterials. This review highlights the microenvironment of cancer cells and how it is different from that of healthy tissue. We gave special emphasis to the physiological shear stresses existing in the cancerous surroundings, since these stresses have a profound effect on cancer cell/nanoparticle interaction. Finally, this study reviews relevant examples of investigations aimed at clarifying the cellular nanoparticle uptake behavior under both static and dynamic conditions.

Indexed as

anti-cancerflowin vitronanomedicinenanoparticleshear stresstargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID32708521
PMCPMC7409087
OpenAlexW3043417383

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.