ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020
Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- NMR-Based Metabolomic and QMB-Based E-Nose Approaches to Evaluate the Quality and Sensory Features of Pasta Fortified with Alternative Protein Sources.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A Comprehensive Review on Sensor-Based Electronic Nose for Food Quality and Safety.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Integration of Destructive and Non-Destructive Analytical Determinations for Evaluating Quality of Fresh and Roasted Hazelnuts Subjected to Different Processing Temperatures.Food science & nutrition · 2025Article
- Differentiation through E-nose and GC-FID data modeling of rosé sparkling wines elaborated via traditional and Charmat methods.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2025Article
- Review
- A Pilot Study forSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Lab-Made E-Nose-MOS Device for Assessing the Bacterial Growth in a Solid Culture Medium.Biosensors · 2022Article
- Paving the Way for a Green Transition in the Design of Sensors and Biosensors for the Detection of Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs).Biosensors · 2022Review
- Electronic Nose Differentiation betweenMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Keeping Track ofSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Application of a Low-Cost Electronic Nose for Differentiation between Pathogenic OomycetesSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The efficiency of electronic noses in detecting and identifying microorganisms has been proven by several studies. Since volatile compounds change with the growth of colonies, the identification of strains is highly dependent on the growing conditions. In this paper, the effects of growth were investigated with different species of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.