Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708450›Full record

ArticleSensors (Basel, Switzerland)2020

Wearable Biofeedback System to Induce Desired Walking Speed in Overground Gait Training.

Huanghe Zhang, Yefei Yin, Zhuo Chen, Yufeng Zhang, Ashwini K Rao, Yi Guo, Damiano Zanotto

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sensors (Basel, Switzerland), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Huanghe ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2770-8335
Yefei YinDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Zhuo ChenDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.
Yufeng ZhangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0003-5196
Ashwini K RaoDepartment of Rehabilitation & Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7837-9116
Yi GuoDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7158-351X
Damiano ZanottoDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3514-6889
Stevens Institute of Technology · USColumbia University · US

Funding

National Science Foundation 1838725National Science Foundation 1838799
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Biofeedback systems have been extensively used in walking exercises for gait improvement. Past research has focused on modulating the wearer's cadence, gait variability, or symmetry, but none of the previous works has addressed the problem of inducing a desired walking speed in the wearer. In this paper, we present a new, minimally obtrusive wearable biofeedback system (WBS) that uses closed-loop vibrotactile control to elicit desired changes in the wearer's walking speed, based on the predicted user response to anticipatory and delayed feedback. The performance of the proposed control was compared to conventional open-loop rhythmic vibrotactile stimulation with N = 10 healthy individuals who were asked to complete a set of walking tasks along an oval path. The closed-loop vibrotactile control consistently demonstrated better performance than the open-loop control in inducing desired changes in the wearer's walking speed, both with constant and with time-varying target walking speeds. Neither open-loop nor closed-loop stimuli affected natural gait significantly, when the target walking speed was set to the individual's preferred walking speed. Given the importance of walking speed as a summary indicator of health and physical performance, the closed-loop vibrotactile control can pave the way for new technology-enhanced protocols for gait rehabilitation.

Indexed as

Biofeedback, PsychologyWalking SpeedWearable Electronic DevicesAdultHumansMaleRehabilitationclosed-loop controlinstrumented footwearreal-time gait parameter estimationSportSolewearable biofeedback system

Identifiers

PMID32708450
PMCPMC7412458
OpenAlexW3042474650

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.