Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708446›Full record

Trial reportNutrients2020

Effects on Gastroesophageal Reflux of Donkey Milk-Derived Human Milk Fortifier Versus Standard Fortifier in Preterm Newborns: Additional Data from the FortiLat Study.

Francesco Cresi, Elena Maggiora, Alice Pirra, Paola Tonetto, Carlotta Rubino, Laura Cavallarin, Marzia Giribaldi, Guido E Moro, Chiara Peila, Alessandra Coscia

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco CresiNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2139-6855
Elena MaggioraNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Alice PirraNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Paola TonettoNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Carlotta RubinoNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4217-4434
Laura CavallarinInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, Italian National Research Council, 10126 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7006-1683
Marzia GiribaldiResearch Centre for Engineering and Agro-Food Processing, Council for Agricultural Research and Economics (CREA), 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3507-7684
Guido E MoroItalian Association of Human Milk Banks, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3429-3257
Chiara PeilaNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
Alessandra CosciaNeonatal Care Unit, Sant'Anna Hospital, Città della Salute e della Scienza, Università degli Studi di Torino, 10126 Turin, Italy.
University of Turin · ITCereal Research Centre · ITInstitute of Sciences of Food Production · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFeeding intolerance is a frequent diagnosis in very preterm infants. As seen in the FortiLat trial, human milk fortification with the new donkey milk-derived human milk fortifier (DF) seems to improve feeding tolerance in these infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of using the DF compared with bovine milk-derived fortifier (BF) on gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.

methodsOver a total of 156 preterm infants were enrolled into the FortiLat trial (GA <32 weeks and birth weight <1500 g) and randomized into the BF arm or DF arm, and we selected all infants with clinical signs of GER and cardiorespiratory (CR) symptoms. All the infants underwent CR and multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII/pH) monitoring associated with gastric ultrasound to evaluate GER and gastric emptying time.

results10 infants were enrolled, and 5 were in the DF arm. At MII/pH, infants enrolled into the DF arm showed a lower GER frequency than BF arm infants (

conclusionThe use of donkey-derived human milk fortifier reduced the GER frequency and consequently should be recommended in infants with feeding intolerance.

Indexed as

Food, FortifiedInfant FormulaInfant, Very Low Birth WeightMilkMilk, HumanAnimalsCattleEquidaeFemaleGastroesophageal RefluxHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaMalecardiorespiratory eventsfeeding intoleranceGORDMII/pHtolerancevery pretermVLBW

Identifiers

PMID32708446
PMCPMC7400944
OpenAlexW3043694084

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.