Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708404›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020

Adopting Machine Learning and Spatial Analysis Techniques for Driver Risk Assessment: Insights from a Case Study.

Muhammad Zahid, Yangzhou Chen, Arshad Jamal, Khalaf A Al-Ofi, Hassan M Al-Ahmadi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Exploring the Injury Severity Risk Factors in Fatal Crashes with Neural Network.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad ZahidCollege of Metropolitan Transportation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9143-8328
Yangzhou ChenCollege of Artificial Intelligence and Automation, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China.
Arshad JamalDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals KFUPM BOX 5055, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7284-7348
Khalaf A Al-OfiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals KFUPM BOX 5055, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.
Hassan M Al-AhmadiDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals KFUPM BOX 5055, Dhahran 31261, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5664-1112
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals · SABeijing University of Technology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traffic violations usually caused by aggressive driving behavior are often seen as a primary contributor to traffic crashes. Violations are either caused by an unintentional or deliberate act of drivers that jeopardize the lives of fellow drivers, pedestrians, and property. This study is aimed to investigate different traffic violations (overspeeding, wrong-way driving, illegal parking, non-compliance traffic control devices, etc.) using spatial analysis and different machine learning methods. Georeferenced violation data along two expressways (S308 and S219) for the year 2016 was obtained from the traffic police department, in the city of Luzhou, China. Detailed descriptive analysis of the data showed that wrong-way driving was the most common violation type observed. Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW) interpolation in the ArcMap Geographic Information System (GIS) was used to develop violation hotspots zones to guide on efficient use of limited resources during the treatment of high-risk sites. Lastly, a systematic Machine Learning (ML) framework, such as K Nearest Neighbors (KNN) models (using k = 3, 5, 7, 10, and 12), support vector machine (SVM), and CN2 Rule Inducer, was utilized for classification and prediction of each violation type as a function of several explanatory variables. The predictive performance of proposed ML models was examined using different evaluation metrics, such as Area Under the Curve (AUC), F-score, precision, recall, specificity, and run time. The results also showed that the KNN model with k = 7 using manhattan evaluation had an accuracy of 99% and outperformed the SVM and CN2 Rule Inducer. The outcome of this study could provide the practitioners and decision-makers with essential insights for appropriate engineering and traffic control measures to improve the safety of road-users.

Indexed as

Automobile DrivingMachine LearningAccidents, TrafficChinaGeographic Information SystemsHumansPedestriansRisk AssessmentSpatial Analysisaggressive drivinggeographic information system (GIS)inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolationmachine learningtraffic violations

Identifiers

PMID32708404
PMCPMC7400276
OpenAlexW3043025514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.