Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32708397›Full record

ReviewCells2020

Engineering CD4+ T Cells to Enhance Cancer Immunity.

Francesca Sillito, Angelika Holler, Hans J Stauss

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. High Expression ofDisease markers · 2022
    Article
  7. Personalized Cancer Vaccines: Clinical Landscape, Challenges, and Opportunities.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesca SillitoDivision of Infection and Immunity, Institute of Immunity and Transplantation, University College London, Royal Free Hospital, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Angelika HollerCancer Institute, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
Hans J StaussCancer Institute, Royal Free Hospital, University College London, London NW3 2PF, UK.
The Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/P019072/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review presents key advances in combining T cell receptor (TCR) gene transfer to redirect T-cell specificity with gene engineering in order to enhance cancer-protective immune function. We discuss how emerging insights might be applied to CD4+ T cells. Although much attention has been paid to the role of CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in tumour protection, we provide convincing evidence that CD4+ helper T cells play a critical role in cancer immune responses in animal models and also in patients. We demonstrate that genetic engineering technologies provide exciting opportunities to extend the specificity range of CD4+ T cells from MHC class-II-presented epitopes to include peptides presented by MHC class I molecules. Functional enhancement of tumour immunity can improve the sensitivity of T cells to cancer antigens, promote survival in a hostile tumour microenvironment, boost cancer-protective effector mechanisms and enable the formation of T-cell memory. Engineered cancer-specific CD4+ T cells may contribute to protective immunity by a direct pathway involving cancer cell killing, and by an indirect pathway that boosts the function, persistence and memory formation of CD8+ T cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsCD4-Positive T-LymphocytesCell EngineeringCytokinesHumansImmunologic MemoryNeoplasmsSignal TransductionCytokinesinterferon-gamma (IFN-γ)major histocompatibility complex (MHC)mechanistic target of Rapamycin 1 (mTORC1)programmed death receptor 1 (PD-1)T cell receptor (TCR)T helper cell (Th)

Identifiers

PMID32708397
PMCPMC7407306
OpenAlexW3043799549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.