ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2020
Voices of Community Partners: Perspectives Gained from Conversations of Community-Based Participatory Research Experiences.
Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Embodying well-being in research: key principles and praxis.Frontiers in education · 2026Article
- Reimagining Partnerships Between Black Communities and Academic Health Research Institutions: Towards Equitable Power in Engagement.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
- Community health needs assessment: findings from a community-university partnership strengthening program on maternal and child health in Pakistan.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Community/patient group champion team retrospective look at engage for equity PLUS: Results from a post-intervention champion team focus group.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Lessons from Two Latino Communities Working with Academic Partners to Increase Access to COVID-19 Testing.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2024Article
- Partnering with Families and Communities to Improve Child Health and Health Equity.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023Review
- The Creation of a Program of Engagement and Outreach for COVID-19 Among African Americans Through Community-Academic Partnerships.Journal of community health · 2021Article
- Reflections on the Five Laws of Integrating Medical and Social Services-21 Years Later.The Milbank quarterly · 2021Article
- Development of a Binational Framework for Active and Healthy Ageing (AHA) Bridging Austria and Slovenia in a Thermal Spa Region.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Evaluating Research Centers in Minority Institutions: Framework, Metrics, Best Practices, and Challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Community-based participatory research (CBPR) has been documented as an effective approach to research with underserved communities, particularly with racial and ethnic minority groups. However, much of the literature promoting the use of CBPR with underserved communities is written from the perspective of the researchers and not from the perspective of the community partner. The purpose of this article is to capture lessons learned from the community partners' insight gained through their experiences with CBPR. A multi-investigator consensus method was used to qualitatively code the transcripts of a CBPR story-telling video series. Seven major themes were identified: (1) expectations for engaging in research, (2) cultural humility, (3) respecting the partnership, (4) open communication, (5) genuine commitment, (6) valuing strengths and recognizing capacities, and (7) collaborating to yield meaningful results. The themes drawn from the community partner's voice align with the tenets of CBPR advanced in the academic literature. More opportunities to include the community voice when promoting CBPR should be undertaken to help introduce the concepts to potential community partners who may be research cautious.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.