Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32707953›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2020

Potential of Recycling Cauliflower and Romanesco Wastes in Ruminant Feeding:

Trinidad de Evan, Andrea Vintimilla, Eduarda Molina-Alcaide, María José Ranilla, María Dolores Carro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Food Waste Utilization for Reducing Carbon Footprints towards Sustainable and Cleaner Environment: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  4. Anaemia in Ruminants Caused by Plant Consumption.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Trinidad de EvanDepartamento de Producción Agraria, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Agroalimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7391-9614
Andrea VintimillaDepartamento de Producción Agraria, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Agroalimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.
Eduarda Molina-AlcaideEstación Experimental del Zaidin (Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas), Profesor Albareda 1, 18008 Granada, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-3222-604X
María José RanillaDepartamento de Producción Animal, Universidad de León, 24071 León, Spain.
María Dolores CarroDepartamento de Producción Agraria, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica, Agroalimentaria y de Biosistemas, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria, 28040 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4221-9057

Funding

Agencia Estatal de Investigación AGL2016-75322-C2-1-RAgencia Estatal de Investigación AGL2016-75322-C2-2-R
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nutritive values for ruminants of cauliflower (CAU) and Romanesco (ROM) wastes (leaves, stems and sprouts) were assessed by analyzing their chemical composition,

Indexed as

cauliflowerCH4in vitro intestinal digestibilityin vitro rumen fermentationRomanescowastes

Identifiers

PMID32707953
PMCPMC7459492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.