Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32707779›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020

Clinical and Analytical Validation of a Novel Urine-Based Test for the Detection of Allograft Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients.

Niamh Nolan, Katherine Valdivieso, Rekha Mani, Joshua Y C Yang, Reuben D Sarwal, Phoebe Katzenbach, Kavita Chalasani, Donna Hongo, Gladys Lugtu, Corinne Mark and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Noninvasive Diagnosis of Kidney Allograft Rejection.Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Niamh NolanNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Katherine ValdiviesoNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Rekha ManiNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Joshua Y C YangNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2410-7817
Reuben D SarwalNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Phoebe KatzenbachNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Kavita ChalasaniNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Donna HongoNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Gladys LugtuNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Corinne MarkNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Edna ChenNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Reggie NijorNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
David SavocaNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
David S WexlerNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Todd WhitsonNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Shih-Jwo HuangNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Lucy H LuNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Robert J X ZawadaNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Evangelos HytopoulosNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
Minnie M SarwalNephroSant Inc., 150 North Hill Drive, Brisbane, CA 94005, USA.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

NephroSant Inc. N/A
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this clinical validation study, we developed and validated a urinary Q-Score generated from the quantitative test QSant, formerly known as QiSant, for the detection of biopsy-confirmed acute rejection in kidney transplants. Using a cohort of 223 distinct urine samples collected from three independent sites and from both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients, we examined the diagnostic utility of the urinary Q-Score for detection of acute rejection in renal allografts. Statistical models based upon the measurements of the six QSant biomarkers (cell-free DNA, methylated-cell-free DNA, clusterin, CXCL10, creatinine, and total protein) generated a renal transplant Q-Score that reliably differentiated stable allografts from acute rejections in both adult and pediatric renal transplant patients. The composite Q-Score was able to detect both T cell-mediated rejection and antibody-mediated rejection patients and differentiate them from stable non-rejecting patients with a receiver-operator characteristic curve area under the curve of 99.8% and an accuracy of 98.2%. Q-Scores < 32 indicated the absence of active rejection and Q-Scores ≥ 32 indicated an increased risk of active rejection. At the Q-Score cutoff of 32, the overall sensitivity was 95.8% and specificity was 99.3%. At a prevalence of 25%, positive and negative predictive values for active rejection were 98.0% and 98.6%, respectively. The Q-Score also detected subclinical rejection in patients without an elevated serum creatinine level but identified by a protocol biopsy. This study confirms that QSant is an accurate and quantitative measurement suitable for routine monitoring of renal allograft status.

Indexed as

acute rejectionallograftantibody-mediated rejectioncell-free DNACXCL10kidney transplantmethylated cell-free DNAQiSantQSantsubclinical rejectionT cell-mediated rejection

Identifiers

PMID32707779
PMCPMC7465561
OpenAlexW3045130526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.