ArticlePloS one2020
Estimating sparse functional brain networks with spatial constraints for MCI identification.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Brain Connectivity Estimation Network for the Identification of Dementia.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- Accurate module induced brain network construction for mild cognitive impairment identification with functional MRI.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Estimating high-order brain functional networks by correlation-preserving embedding.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Adaptive noise depression for functional brain network estimation.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Constructing Dynamic Brain Functional Networks via Hyper-Graph Manifold Regularization for Mild Cognitive Impairment Classification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Multi-Scale Graph Representation Learning for Autism Identification With Functional MRI.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2021Article
- Brain Function Network: Higher Order vs. More Discrimination.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Modularity-Guided Functional Brain Network Analysis for Early-Stage Dementia Identification.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2021Article
- Correction: Estimating sparse functional brain networks with spatial constraints for MCI identification.PloS one · 2021Article
- Causality-Preserving Generative Adversarial Networks for the Diagnosis of Neurological Disorders.IET systems biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional brain network (FBN), estimated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), has become a potentially useful way of diagnosing neurological disorders in their early stages by comparing the connectivity patterns between different brain regions across subjects. However, this depends, to a great extent, on the quality of the estimated FBNs, indicating that FBN estimation is a key step for the subsequent task of disorder identification. In the past decades, researchers have developed many methods to estimate FBNs, including Pearson's correlation and (regularized) partial correlation, etc. Despite their widespread applications in current studies, most of the existing methods estimate FBNs only based on the dependency between the measured blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD) signals, which ignores spatial relationship of signals associated with different brain regions. Due to the space and material parsimony principle of our brain, we believe that the spatial distance between brain regions has an important influence on FBN topology. Therefore, in this paper, we assume that spatially neighboring brain regions tend to have stronger connections and/or share similar connections with others; based on this assumption, we propose two novel methods to estimate FBNs by incorporating the information of brain region distance into the estimation model. To validate the effectiveness of the proposed methods, we use the estimated FBNs to identify subjects with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from normal controls (NCs). Experimental results show that the proposed methods are better than the baseline methods in the sense of MCI identification accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.