Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32707448›Full record

ArticleEBioMedicine2020

Real-time imaging of polymersome nanoparticles in zebrafish embryos engrafted with melanoma cancer cells: Localization, toxicity and treatment analysis.

Agnese Kocere, Julien Resseguier, Jens Wohlmann, Frode Miltzow Skjeldal, Shanawaz Khan, Martin Speth, Nils-Jørgen Knudsen Dal, Matthew Yoke Wui Ng, Noelia Alonso-Rodriguez, Edoardo Scarpa and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EBioMedicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Zebrafish live imaging: a strong weapon in anticancer drug discovery and development.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Zebrafish as a Model for Anticancer Nanomedicine Studies.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Agnese KocereUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Julien ResseguierUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Jens WohlmannUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Frode Miltzow SkjeldalUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Shanawaz KhanUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Martin SpethUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Nils-Jørgen Knudsen DalUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Matthew Yoke Wui NgUniversity of Oslo, Domus Medica, Sognsvannsveien 9, 0317 Oslo, Norway.
Noelia Alonso-RodriguezUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Edoardo ScarpaUniversity College London, Department of Chemistry, 20 Gordon Street, WC1H 0AJ London, United Kingdom.
Loris RizzelloUniversity of Milan, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, via Mangiagalli 25, 20133 Milan (Italy); Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, 08028 Barcelona (Spain).
Giuseppe BattagliaUniversity College London, Department of Chemistry, 20 Gordon Street, WC1H 0AJ London, United Kingdom; Institute for Bioengineering of Catalonia (IBEC), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Baldiri Reixac 10-12, 08028 Barcelona (Spain); Institute for the Physics of Living Systems, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, London, United Kingdom; Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), Passeig Lluís Companys 2308010 Barcelona, Spain.
Gareth GriffithsUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway.
Federico FenaroliUniversity of Oslo, Department of Biosciences, Blindernveien 31, 0371 Oslo, Norway. Electronic address: federico.fenaroli@ibv.uio.no.
University of Oslo · NOInstitució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats · ESInstitute for Bioengineering of Catalonia · ESUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe developing zebrafish is an emerging tool in nanomedicine, allowing non-invasive live imaging of the whole animal at higher resolution than is possible in the more commonly used mouse models. In addition, several transgenic fish lines are available endowed with selected cell types expressing fluorescent proteins; this allows nanoparticles to be visualized together with host cells.

methodsHere, we introduce the zebrafish neural tube as a robust injection site for cancer cells, excellently suited for high resolution imaging. We use light and electron microscopy to evaluate cancer growth and to follow the fate of intravenously injected nanoparticles.

findingsFluorescently labelled mouse melanoma B16 cells, when injected into this structure proliferated rapidly and stimulated angiogenesis of new vessels. In addition, macrophages, but not neutrophils, selectively accumulated in the tumour region. When injected intravenously, nanoparticles made of Cy5-labelled poly(ethylene glycol)-block-poly(2-(diisopropyl amino) ethyl methacrylate) (PEG-PDPA) selectively accumulated in the neural tube cancer region and were seen in individual cancer cells and tumour associated macrophages. Moreover, when doxorubicin was released from PEG-PDPA, in a pH dependant manner, these nanoparticles could strongly reduce toxicity and improve the treatment outcome compared to the free drug in zebrafish xenotransplanted with mouse melanoma B16 or human derived melanoma cells.

interpretationThe zebrafish has the potential of becoming an important intermediate step, before the mouse model, for testing nanomedicines against patient-derived cancer cells.

fundingWe received funding from the Norwegian research council and the Norwegian cancer society.

Indexed as

Administration, IntravenousAnimalsCarbocyaninesCell Line, TumorDoxorubicinHumansMacrophagesMelanoma, ExperimentalMiceMicroscopy, ElectronNanoparticlesNeoplasm TransplantationNeural TubeNeutrophilsPolyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic AcidsCarbocyaninescyanine dye 5Doxorubicinpoly(2-(diisopropylamino)ethyl methacrylate)Polyethylene GlycolsPolymethacrylic Acids

Identifiers

PMID32707448
PMCPMC7381511
OpenAlexW3045075242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.