Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32707062›Full record

ArticleCurrent biology : CB2020

Categorical Rhythms Are Shared between Songbirds and Humans.

Tina C Roeske, Ofer Tchernichovski, David Poeppel, Nori Jacoby

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current biology : CB, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Cortico-striatal network architecture shapes rhythmic biases in music.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hidden assumptions of integer ratio analyses in bioacoustics and music.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  14. Core systems of music perception.Trends in cognitive sciences · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Accelerando and crescendo in African penguin ecstatic display songs.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tina C RoeskeMusic Department, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grueneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany; Department of Psychology, Hunter College, Hunter North 642, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA. Electronic address: tina.roeske@ae.mpg.de.
Ofer TchernichovskiDepartment of Psychology, Hunter College, Hunter North 642, 695 Park Avenue, New York, NY 10065, USA; The CUNY Graduate Center, 365 5th Avenue, New York, NY 10016, USA. Electronic address: otcherni@hunter.cuny.edu.
David PoeppelNeuroscience Department, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grueneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: david.poeppel@ae.mpg.de.
Nori JacobyResearch Group Computational Auditory Perception, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, Grueneburgweg 14, 60322 Frankfurt, Germany; The Center for Science and Society, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027, USA. Electronic address: nori.jacoby@ae.mpg.de.

Funding

BEHAVIORAL MECHANISMS OF VOCAL IMITATIONR01DC004722 · NIDCD · ROCKEFELLER UNIVERSITY · PI TCHERNICHOVSKI, OFER · 2001 to 2018
$5.1M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC004722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rhythm is a prominent feature of music. Of the infinite possible ways of organizing events in time, musical rhythms are almost always distributed categorically. Such categories can facilitate the transmission of culture-a feature that songbirds and humans share. We compared rhythms of live performances of music to rhythms of wild thrush nightingale and domestic zebra finch songs. In nightingales, but not in zebra finches, we found universal rhythm categories, with patterns that were surprisingly similar to those of music. Isochronous 1:1 rhythms were similarly common. Interestingly, a bias toward small ratios (around 1:2 to 1:3), which is highly abundant in music, was observed also in thrush nightingale songs. Within that range, however, there was no statistically significant bias toward exact integer ratios (1:2 or 1:3) in the birds. High-ratio rhythms were abundant in the nightingale song and are structurally similar to fusion rhythms (ornaments) in music. In both species, preferred rhythms remained invariant over extended ranges of tempos, indicating natural categories. The number of rhythm categories decreased at higher tempos, with a threshold above which rhythm became highly stereotyped. In thrush nightingales, this threshold occurred at a tempo twice faster than in humans, indicating weaker structural constraints and a remarkable motor proficiency. Together, the results suggest that categorical rhythms reflect similar constraints on learning motor skills across species. The saliency of categorical rhythms across humans and thrush nightingales suggests that they promote, or emerge from, the cultural transmission of learned vocalizations. VIDEO ABSTRACT.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonMusicAdolescentAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansLearningMaleMiddle AgedSongbirdsVocalization, AnimalYoung Adultbio-musicologybirdsongcategorical rhythmcross-cultural comparisonfinger tappinginter-species comparisonlearned vocalizationsmusicrhythm production

Identifiers

PMID32707062
PMCPMC7511425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.