Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32707011›Full record

ArticleGlobal spine journal2020

Etiology and Outcomes of Spinal Cord Infarct: A Case Series From a Level 1 Trauma Center.

Laurence Ge, Karan Arul, Michael Stoner, Addisu Mesfin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global spine journal, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laurence GeUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Karan ArulUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Michael StonerUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.
Addisu MesfinUniversity of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-4185
University of Rochester · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

STUDY

designRetrospective study.

objectivesTo evaluate the demographics, prevalence, etiology, severity, and outcomes of spinal cord injuries (SCIs) resulting from ischemic infarction.

methodsAll patients with SCI and a diagnosis of cord infarct who were admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation unit at a level 1 trauma center from January 2003 to January 2014 were identified using an administrative billing database. Outcomes measures were evaluated.

resultsAmong 685 unique SCI patients who were identified, 30 (4.4%) had SCI due to spinal ischemic infarction. The mean age was 59 years (range 17-80 years). Fifty percent of patients had ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) A and B severity. Most common causes were the following: 6 (20%) abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repairs, 6 (20%) arteriovenous fistulas, and 6 (20%) with an unknown cause. Surgical complications led to 4 (13.3%) cord infarcts and was associated with a higher severity of injury (

conclusionsWhile the existing literature associates spinal cord infarction with aortic pathologies and surgery, these caused less than 30% of cases, while nonaortic surgical complications were associated with the most severe injuries. Outcomes were worse than previously reported in the literature.

Indexed as

abdominal aortic aneurysmASIA gradeepidemiologyetiologyoutcomesspinal cord infarctspinal cord injuryspinal cord ischemia

Identifiers

PMID32707011
PMCPMC7383787
OpenAlexW2973708617

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.