Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706862›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2021

Fully automated hybrid approach to predict the IDH mutation status of gliomas via deep learning and radiomics.

Yoon Seong Choi, Sohi Bae, Jong Hee Chang, Seok-Gu Kang, Se Hoon Kim, Jinna Kim, Tyler Hyungtaek Rim, Seung Hong Choi, Rajan Jain, Seung-Koo Lee

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 154 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
154citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

154 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 232 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

94 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Yoon Seong ChoiDuke-NUS Medical School, RADSC ACP, Singapore.
Sohi BaeDepartment of Radiology, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea.
Jong Hee ChangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Seok-Gu KangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Se Hoon KimDepartment of Pathology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Jinna KimDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Tyler Hyungtaek RimSingapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore National Eye Centre, Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore.
Seung Hong ChoiDepartment of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Rajan JainDepartment of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Seung-Koo LeeDepartment of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiological Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Yonsei University · KRNational Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital · KRNew York University · USSeoul National University · KRSingapore National Eye Center · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlioma prognosis depends on isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation status. We aimed to predict the IDH status of gliomas from preoperative MR images using a fully automated hybrid approach with convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and radiomics.

methodsWe reviewed 1166 preoperative MR images of gliomas (grades II-IV) from Severance Hospital (n = 856), Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH; n = 107), and The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA; n = 203). The Severance set was subdivided into the development (n = 727) and internal test (n = 129) sets. Based on T1 postcontrast, T2, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images, a fully automated model was developed that comprised a CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) and CNN-based classifier for IDH status prediction (Model 2) that uses a hybrid approach based on 2D tumor images and radiomic features from 3D tumor shape and loci guided by Model 1. The trained model was tested on internal (a subset of the Severance set) and external (SNUH and TCIA) test sets.

resultsThe CNN for tumor segmentation (Model 1) achieved a dice coefficient of 0.86-0.92 across datasets. Our hybrid model achieved accuracies of 93.8%, 87.9%, and 78.8%, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves of 0.96, 0.94, and 0.86 and areas under the precision-recall curves of 0.88, 0.82, and 0.81 in the internal test, SNUH, and TCIA sets, respectively.

conclusionsOur fully automated hybrid model demonstrated the potential to be a highly reproducible and generalizable tool across different datasets for the noninvasive prediction of the IDH status of gliomas.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsDeep LearningGliomaHumansIsocitrate DehydrogenaseMagnetic Resonance ImagingMutationRetrospective StudiesIsocitrate Dehydrogenaseconvolutional neural networkgliomaisocitrate dehydrogenase mutationmagnetic resonance imagingradiomics

Identifiers

PMID32706862
PMCPMC7906063
OpenAlexW3044997014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.