Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706825›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Utilization, financial outcomes and stakeholder perspectives of a re-organized adult sickle cell program.

Robert Rousseau, Daniel F Weisberg, Jack Gorero, Vivek Parwani, Janis Bozzo, Kathleen Kenyon, Constance Smith, Joanna Cole, Susanna Curtis, Ariadna Forray and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Robert RousseauNortheastern University Bouvé College of Health Sciences, Boston, MA, United States of America.
Daniel F WeisbergIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America.
Jack GoreroHartford Hospital, Hartford, CT, United States of America.
Vivek ParwaniYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Janis BozzoYale New Haven Health, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Kathleen KenyonYale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Constance SmithYale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Joanna ColeYale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Susanna CurtisYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
Ariadna ForrayYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.
John D RobertsYale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-2020-6201
Yale University · USYale New Haven Hospital · USHartford Hospital · USIcahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai · USNortheastern University · USYale New Haven Health System · US

Funding

UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS MINORITY BASED CCOPU10CA074811 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO · PI PEACE, DAVID J · 1997 to 2011
$8.5M
NCI National Clinical Trials Network U10U10CA180857 · NCI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BARBORIAK, DANIEL P, BRIZEL, DAVID M · 2014 to 2018
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS U10 CA074811NCI NIH HHS U10 CA180857
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2011 Yale New Haven Hospital, in response to high utilization of acute care services and widespread patient and health care personnel dissatisfaction, set out to improve its care of adults living with sickle cell disease. Re-organization components included recruitment of additional personnel; re-locating inpatients to a single nursing unit; reducing the number of involved providers; personalized care plans for pain management; setting limits upon access to parenteral opioids; and an emphasis upon clinic visits focused upon home management of pain as well as specialty and primary care. Outcomes included dramatic reductions in inpatient days (79%), emergency department visits (63%), and hospitalizations (53%); an increase in outpatient visits (31%); and a decrease in costs (49%). Providers and nurses viewed the re-organization and outcomes positively. Most patients reported improvements in pain control and life style; many patients thought the re-organization process was unfair. Their primary complaint was a lack of shared decision-making. We attribute the contrast in these perspectives to the inherent difficulties of managing recurrent acute and chronic pain with opioids, especially within the context of the imbalance in wellness, power, and privilege between persons living with sickle cell disease, predominantly persons of color and poor socio-economic status, and health care organizations and their personnel.

Indexed as

Hospitals, UniversityAdultAmbulatory CareAnalgesics, OpioidAnemia, Sickle CellCosts and Cost AnalysisFemaleHospitalizationHumansInpatientsMaleNursesPain ManagementPatient Outcome AssessmentPhysiciansPrimary Health CareAnalgesics, Opioid

Identifiers

PMID32706825
PMCPMC7380627
OpenAlexW3044650694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.