Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706813›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Integration and evaluation of a gradient-based needle navigation system for percutaneous MR-guided interventions.

Li Pan, Steffi Valdeig, Urte Kägebein, Kun Qing, Barry Fetics, Amir Roth, Erez Nevo, Bennet Hensen, Clifford R Weiss, Frank K Wacker

Open access · goldAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Li PanSiemens Healthineers, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Steffi ValdeigDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Urte KägebeinDepartment of Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7525-0846
Kun QingDepartment of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States of America.
Barry FeticsRobin Medical Inc., Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Amir RothRobin Medical Inc., Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Erez NevoRobin Medical Inc., Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Bennet HensenDepartment of Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Clifford R WeissDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States of America.
Frank K WackerDepartment of Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DERobin Medical (United States) · USJohns Hopkins University · USSiemens Healthcare (United States) · US

Funding

Surgical navigation system for in-bore MRI-guided breast interventionsR44CA124238 · NCI · ROBIN MEDICAL, INC. · PI NEVO, EREZ · 2006 to 2008
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R44 CA124238
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to integrate an interactive gradient-based needle navigation system and to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of the system for real-time MR guided needle puncture in a multi-ring phantom and in vivo in a porcine model. The gradient-based navigation system was implemented in a 1.5T MRI. An interactive multi-slice real-time sequence was modified to provide the excitation gradients used by two sets of three orthogonal pick-up coils integrated into a needle holder. Position and orientation of the needle holder were determined and the trajectory was superimposed on pre-acquired MR images. A gel phantom with embedded ring targets was used to evaluate accuracy using 3D distance from needle tip to target. Six punctures were performed in animals to evaluate feasibility, time, overall error (target to needle tip) and system error (needle tip to the guidance needle trajectory) in vivo. In the phantom experiments, the overall error was 6.2±2.9 mm (mean±SD) and 4.4±1.3 mm, respectively. In the porcine model, the setup time ranged from 176 to 204 seconds, the average needle insertion time was 96.3±40.5 seconds (min: 42 seconds; max: 154 seconds). The overall error and the system error was 8.8±7.8 mm (min: 0.8 mm; max: 20.0 mm) and 3.3±1.4 mm (min: 1.8 mm; max: 5.2 mm), respectively.

Indexed as

Biopsy, NeedleImage-Guided BiopsyMagnetic Resonance ImagingPuncturesAnimalsNeedlesPhantoms, ImagingSwine

Identifiers

PMID32706813
PMCPMC7380643
OpenAlexW3043987496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.