Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706772›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2020

Brucellosis in ruminants and pastoralists in Borena, Southern Ethiopia.

Bedaso Mammo Edao, Gobena Ameni, Zerihun Assefa, Stefan Berg, Adrian M Whatmore, James L N Wood

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Seroprevalence of Brucella Infection and Its Determinants Among Pregnant Women Attending Antenatal Care in Burao City: At the Human Livestock Interface in Northeast Somaliland, Somalia.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2025
    Article
  13. Veterinary sciences · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Bedaso Mammo EdaoDisease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge Madingley Road, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2123-0978
Gobena AmeniAddis Ababa University, Aklilu Lemma Institute of Pathobiology, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zerihun AssefaAddis Ababa University, College of Veterinary Medicine, Bishoftu, Ethiopia.
Stefan BergAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
Adrian M WhatmoreAnimal and Plant Health Agency, Woodham Lane, Addlestone, United Kingdom.
James L N WoodDisease Dynamics Unit, Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Cambridge Madingley Road, United Kingdom.
Animal and Plant Health Agency · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBAddis Ababa University · ETUnited Arab Emirates University · AE

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/L018977/1Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brucellosis is a bacterial zoonotic disease that has important veterinary and public health consequences as well as economic impact in sub Saharan Africa including Ethiopia. A cross-sectional study was conducted in four selected districts of Borena Pastoral setting in Southern Ethiopia from October 2017 to February 2018 to estimate the prevalence of brucellosis and assess associated risk factors in cattle, sheep, goats and occupationally associated humans. A total of 750 cattle, 882 sheep and goats and 341 human subjects were screened for evidence of brucellosis using the Rose Bengal Test (RBT) with positive results confirmed by Competitive-ELISA(c-ELISA). Structured questionnaires were used for collection of metadata from individual animals, herders and animal attendants to test the association between explanatory and outcome variables. The overall animal level prevalence was 2.4% (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.4-3.7) in cattle, 3.2% (95% CI: 2.1-4.6) in sheep and goats, and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.2-5) in humans occupationally linked to livestock production systems. Herd size, parity, and history of abortion were risk factors associated with Brucella seropositivity (P<0.05) in cattle whereas in sheep and goats the results showed that district, age group, flock size, and history of abortion were significantly associated risk factors with Brucella seropositivity (P<0.05). Assisting calving and presence of seropositive animals in a household (P<0.05) were significantly associated with Brucella seropositivity in humans. Evidence of brucellosis in various animal species and the associated human population illustrates the need for a coordinated One Health approach to controlling brucellosis so as to improve public health and livestock productivity.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrucellosisCattleCattle DiseasesEthiopiaGoat DiseasesGoatsHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsSheepSheep DiseasesZoonoses

Identifiers

PMID32706772
PMCPMC7406081
OpenAlexW3045234984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.