Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706770›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Depth in convolutional neural networks solves scene segmentation.

Noor Seijdel, Nikos Tsakmakidis, Edward H F de Haan, Sander M Bohte, H Steven Scholte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Noor SeijdelDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8785-8135
Nikos TsakmakidisMachine Learning Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Edward H F de HaanDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0312-3674
Sander M BohteMachine Learning Group, Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
H Steven ScholteDepartment of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLCentrum Wiskunde & Informatica · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Feed-forward deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are, under specific conditions, matching and even surpassing human performance in object recognition in natural scenes. This performance suggests that the analysis of a loose collection of image features could support the recognition of natural object categories, without dedicated systems to solve specific visual subtasks. Research in humans however suggests that while feedforward activity may suffice for sparse scenes with isolated objects, additional visual operations ('routines') that aid the recognition process (e.g. segmentation or grouping) are needed for more complex scenes. Linking human visual processing to performance of DCNNs with increasing depth, we here explored if, how, and when object information is differentiated from the backgrounds they appear on. To this end, we controlled the information in both objects and backgrounds, as well as the relationship between them by adding noise, manipulating background congruence and systematically occluding parts of the image. Results indicate that with an increase in network depth, there is an increase in the distinction between object- and background information. For more shallow networks, results indicated a benefit of training on segmented objects. Overall, these results indicate that, de facto, scene segmentation can be performed by a network of sufficient depth. We conclude that the human brain could perform scene segmentation in the context of object identification without an explicit mechanism, by selecting or "binding" features that belong to the object and ignoring other features, in a manner similar to a very deep convolutional neural network.

Indexed as

Neural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, VisualSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedVisual PerceptionAdolescentAdultBrainFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyReproducibility of ResultsVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32706770
PMCPMC7406083
OpenAlexW3045421197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.