ArticlePLoS computational biology2020
Depth in convolutional neural networks solves scene segmentation.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hierarchical optimization predicts plasticity in the macaque inferior temporal cortex following object training.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Modulatory feedback determines attentional object segmentation in a model of the ventral stream.PloS one · 2025Article
- Feature binding is slow: Temporal integration explains apparent ultrafast binding.Journal of vision · 2024Article
- Empirically Identifying and Computationally Modeling the Brain-Behavior Relationship for Human Scene Categorization.Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2023Article
- Independent spatiotemporal effects of spatial attention and background clutter on human object location representations.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- The spatiotemporal neural dynamics of object location representations in the human brain.Nature human behaviour · 2022Article
- Exploring racial and gender disparities in voice biometrics.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Disrupted visual input unveils the computational details of artificial neural networks for face perception.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2022Article
- Capsule networks as recurrent models of grouping and segmentation.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Local features and global shape information in object classification by deep convolutional neural networks.Vision research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Feed-forward deep convolutional neural networks (DCNNs) are, under specific conditions, matching and even surpassing human performance in object recognition in natural scenes. This performance suggests that the analysis of a loose collection of image features could support the recognition of natural object categories, without dedicated systems to solve specific visual subtasks. Research in humans however suggests that while feedforward activity may suffice for sparse scenes with isolated objects, additional visual operations ('routines') that aid the recognition process (e.g. segmentation or grouping) are needed for more complex scenes. Linking human visual processing to performance of DCNNs with increasing depth, we here explored if, how, and when object information is differentiated from the backgrounds they appear on. To this end, we controlled the information in both objects and backgrounds, as well as the relationship between them by adding noise, manipulating background congruence and systematically occluding parts of the image. Results indicate that with an increase in network depth, there is an increase in the distinction between object- and background information. For more shallow networks, results indicated a benefit of training on segmented objects. Overall, these results indicate that, de facto, scene segmentation can be performed by a network of sufficient depth. We conclude that the human brain could perform scene segmentation in the context of object identification without an explicit mechanism, by selecting or "binding" features that belong to the object and ignoring other features, in a manner similar to a very deep convolutional neural network.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.