Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32706738›Full record

Trial reportJMIR mHealth and uHealth2020

User Engagement Among Diverse Adults in a 12-Month Text Message-Delivered Diabetes Support Intervention: Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Lyndsay A Nelson, Andrew Spieker, Robert Greevy, Lauren M LeStourgeon, Kenneth A Wallston, Lindsay S Mayberry

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Text message surveillance for rapidEpidemiology and infection · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lyndsay A NelsonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-5643
Andrew SpiekerDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0548-8311
Robert GreevyDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1821-3544
Lauren M LeStourgeonDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-8265-6892
Kenneth A WallstonInstitute for Medicine and Public Health, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6310-0306
Lindsay S MayberryDepartment of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0654-4151
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Vanderbilt Center for Diabetes Translation ResearchP30DK092986 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI OSBORN, CHANDRA Y. · 2011 to 2020
$6.7M
Improving Medication Adherence among Underserved Patients with Type 2 DiabetesR01DK100694 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAYBERRY, LINDSAY S. · 2014 to 2018
$3.3M
Vanderbilt Scholars in T4 Translational Research (V-STTaR) ProgramK12HL137943 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI KRIPALANI, SUNIL, ROUMIE, CHRISTIANNE L. · 2017 to 2021
$2.9M
Targeting Family Behaviors to Improve Diabetes Management among Adults with Type 2 DiabetesK01DK106306 · NIDDK · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI MAYBERRY, LINDSAY S. · 2015 to 2018
$568k
NHLBI NIH HHS K12 HL137943NIDDK NIH HHS K01 DK106306NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092986NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK100694
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundText message-delivered interventions are a feasible and scalable approach for improving chronic disease self-care and reducing health disparities; however, information on long-term user engagement with these interventions is limited.

objectiveThe aim of this study is to examine user engagement in a 12-month text message-delivered intervention supporting diabetes self-care, called REACH (Rapid Education/Encouragement And Communications for Health), among racially and socioeconomically diverse patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We explored time trends in engagement, associations between patient characteristics and engagement, and whether the addition of a human component or allowing patients to change their text frequency affected engagement. Qualitative data informed patients' subjective experience of their engagement.

methodsWe recruited patients with T2D for a randomized trial evaluating mobile phone support relative to enhanced treatment as usual. This analysis was limited to participants assigned to the intervention. Participants completed a survey and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) test and received REACH text messages, including self-care promotion texts, interactive texts asking about medication adherence, and adherence feedback texts. For the first 6 months, texts were sent daily, and half of the participants also received monthly phone coaching. After 6 months, coaching stopped, and participants had the option to receive fewer texts for the subsequent 6 months. We defined engagement via responses to the interactive texts and responses to a follow-up interview. We used regression models to analyze associations with response rate and thematic and structural analysis to understand participants' reasons for responding to the texts and their preferred text frequency.

resultsThe participants were, on average, aged 55.8 (SD 9.8) years, 55.2% (137/248) female, and 52.0% (129/248) non-White; 40.7% (101/248) had ≤ a high school education, and 40.7% (101/248) had an annual household income <US $25,000. The median response rate to interactive texts was 91% (IQR 75%-97%) over 12 months. Engagement gradually declined throughout the intervention but remained high. Engagement did not differ by age, gender, education, income, diabetes duration, insulin status, health literacy, or numeracy. Black race and worse baseline medication adherence and HbA1c were each associated with lower engagement, although the effects were small. Nearly half of the participants chose to continue receiving daily texts for the last 6 months of the intervention. Participants who continued daily text messages said they wanted to continue experiencing benefits to their health, whereas those who chose fewer texts said that the daily texts had helped them create routines and they no longer needed them as often. Engagement was not impacted by receiving coaching or by participants' chosen text frequency.

conclusionsWell-designed interactive text messages can engage diverse patients in a self-care intervention for at least 1 year. Variation in and reasons for frequency preference suggest that offering a frequency choice may be important to users' engagement.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Text MessagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMedication AdherenceMiddle AgedSelf Carediabetes mellitus, type 2engagementmedication adherencemHealthmobile healthmobile phoneself-careself-managementtechnologytext messaging

Identifiers

PMID32706738
PMCPMC7404018
OpenAlexW3033302379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.